Post
by Zack » 11 Sep 2024, 13:29
Actually ur wrong Sadaccha , Deqi is right ,It is indeed possible for an ethnic group to embody both savagery and docility, manifesting one or the other depending on the circumstances. Consider, for instance, the Bantu or as we call them the Jareer community in America. When faced with the presence of white men, they exhibit an almost innate docility in all forms , yet when interacting among themselves, they can be remarkably savage and destructive. This duality is starkly clear in historical events, such as the Kenyan elections approximately a decade ago, where intra ethnic community violence and destruction were rampant between Luo and Kikuyos. However, when the international community be it the United Nations, the United States, or the United Kingdom intervened, they behaved like School boys wearing shorts , and listening to the briefings of the International white Community.
To put this in another context, and into pespective one might observe the Gallas, who, when subjected to the dominance of the Amhara, remain notably docile. The Agames, on the other hand, granted them a modicum of freedom, and this has led to the ferocious Qeero uprising. Nevertheless, it is important to note that this newfound savagery can be reined in, as it was for centuries under the firm grip of Amhara aristocratic families.
Furthermore, one might consider the words of Deqi Arewit, who posited that if it weren’t for the Agames, the Gallas might still be living in cages. However, he might also claim credit for this very liberation, as the rise of the Agames to power in Ethiopia was facilitated by Shaebia or the people of Eritrea , thereby indirectly contributing to the emancipation of the Gallas from Amhara subjugation indeed.
Dr Zackovich