Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Welcome Back, Your Excellency!

Post by Zmeselo » 26 Aug 2023, 11:20



President Isaias Afwerki returned home in mid-afternoon hours today, after participating in BRICS-AFRICA OUTREACH & BRICS PLUS DIALOGUES at 15th BRICS SUMMIT in Johannesburg this week. Pre. Isaias, also held extensive discussions with various leaders on the margins of the Summit. @hawelti





___________







ቃል ፕረዚደንት ኢሳይያስ ኣፈወርቂ ኣብ መበል 15 ዋዕላ ‘ብሪክስ’

ፈለማ፡ ምስ’ቶም ቀዲሞም ሓጎሶም ዝገለጹ ብምጽንባር፡ ንዓኻ ክቡር ፕረዚደንትን (ፕረዚደንት ደቡብ ኣፍሪቃ) ካልኦት መራሕቲ ሃገራትን መንግስታትን ‘ብሪክስ’፡ መበል 15 ዋዕላ ከተቃንዑ ብምብቃዕኩም እንቋዕ ኣሐጎሰኩም እብል።

ንህዝቢን መንግስቲን ደቡብ ኣፍሪቃ፡ ስለ’ቲ ዝናውን ምውቕን መስተንግዶኹም ዓሚቚ ምስጋና።

እዚ ዋዕላ’ዚ፡ ግሎባዊ ማሕበረሰብ ኣብ ቀራና መንገዲ ኣብ ዝርከበሉ ወሳኒ እዋን’ዩ ዝካየድ ዘሎ።

እቲ ነጊሱ ዘሎ ሓቛፊ ዘይኮነ፡ ዘየቃዱ፡ ኢፍትሓዊ ሕግታትን መምሪሕታትን ዝሕላገቱ ዓለማዊ ምሕደራ፡ መንቅባቱን ሕጽረታቱን ምግናን ዘየድልዮ ጉሉሕ ጭብጢ እዩ።

ኣመሪካ እትመርሖ ጸቢብ ናይ ፍሉያት ልፍንቲ (ፓክስ ኣመሪካና) ንኣስታት ሓደ ዘመን፡ ሓባራዊ ግሎባዊ ዕብየት ዝዓንቀጸ ከቢድ ማህሰይቲ ኣውሪዱ እዩ።

ድሕሪ ካልኣይ ውግእ ዓለም ክልተ ቊጥባውነት ኣጋፊሩ፡ ኣብዚ ዝሓለፈ 30 ዓመት እንኮ ቊጥባውነት ንምስግዳድ ዝተኻየደ ሃቐነ፡ እልቢ ዘይብሉ ሕልኽላኽ ግጭታትን ዘይምርግጋእን ኣኸቲሉ።

ሓባራዊ ረብሓን ባህግን ዝሰረቱ ትርጉም ዘለዎ ሽርክነት ኣብ መንጎ ሃገራትን ህዝብታትን፣ ኣብ ምዕሩይ ጽንባረን ፍትሓዊ ምቅሊት ሕብስተ-ሃገርን ዝምርኰስ ማሕበራዊ ስኒት መጣምሩ ሕብረተሰብ ፈጢርካ ግሎባዊ ግስጋሰ ንምዕራግ ዝነበረ ዕድላት፡ ንዋያ ገይሩዎ እዩ።

ኣብዚ ዝሓለፈ ክልተ ዘመናት ዝተመዝገበ ድንቂ ቴክኖሎጂያዊ ገስጋስ፡ ብቕኑዕ ስነ-ምግባር ዓይነት ህይወት መላእ ወዲ-ሰብ ክልውጥን ንሓባራዊ ዕብየት ከገልግልን ዓቢ ተኽእሎ ነይሩዎ እዩ።

እንተኾነ፡ ኣብዚ መበል 11 ሰዓት ከይተረፈ፡ እቶም ኣውራ ተሓለቕቲ ዕብለላ፡ ዓለምና ናብ ተራእዩ ዘይፈልጥ ቅልውላው ክትሽመም ይደፍኡዋ ኣለዉ።

ነቲ ብኣመሪካን ኔቶን ዝምራሕ ኲናት ኡክራንያ ንምጉሃር ዝርአ ዘሎ ልጓም ኣልቦ ዕርገት ወጥሪ፡ ክትገልጾ ዘጸግም ዘስካሕክሕ ሳዕቤናት ከኸትል ዝኽእል እዩ።

ኣመሪካን ሰብ ኪዳናን፡ ሰዓት-ታሪኽ ንድሕሪት ንምምላስን፡ ነቲ ብቓላቶም ዘይደንን ዝብልዎ ‘ግሎባዊ ልዕልናን ዕብለላን’ ንምውሓስ ብሓደገኛ መገዲ ህልኽ፡ ኣብ ፈተነ ቅብጸት ተጸሚዶም ኣለዉ።

በዚ ፖሊሲታት’ዚ ኣብ ኣፍሪቃ፡ ማእከላይ ምብራቕን ካልእ ከባቢታት ዓለምን፡ ኣብዚ ዝሓለፈ ዕቑዳት ዝተራእየን ዝቕጽል ዘሎን ኣዕናዊ ውግኣት፡ ዓቐኑ ይፈላለ ይኸውን እምበር ብድምር ዘኸትሎ ዘሎ ዕንወት እምበረ መጠን ገዚፍ እዩ። ኣብ ኒጀር ዘሎ ኩነታት መርኣያ ጥራይ እዩ - መርኣያ ዘመናዊ ጊልያነት። ኩሉ’ቲ ንኤውሮጳ ምንጪ ጸዓት ዝኸውን ዘሎ ማዕድን ‘ኡራንዩም’ ናብ ኣፍሪቃ ተመሊሱ፡ ምንጪ ኤለትሪክ ናይዛ ዝተሃመሸት ኣህጉር እንተዝኸውን ነይሩ፡ ኢልና ክንሓስብ ንኽእል ኢና።

ብዛዕባ ኣፈታትሓ ግጭትን ምጽጋን ሰላምን፣ ኩሉ ዝጸሓፍን ኣብኡ ዝነጥፍ ትካላትን ንጎድኒ ኣጸጊዕና፡ ብቐጥታ ይኹን ብውክልና ዝውላዕ ዘሎ ደማዊ ውግኣት፡ ዝበዝሕ ካብኡ፡ መፍትሒ ከይርከቦ ብውዲታት ዝተሓንከረ እዩ። ዓቃብ ሰላም ሓይልታት፡ ሰብኣዊ ሓገዛት ወዘተ. ልዑል ግዳሰን ሰሃሮን ከምዘሎ ንምምሳል ዘገልገል መዐገሲ ቃንዛ ጥራይ’ዩ።

ትካላትን ኣዕኑድ ኣምራት ግሎባዊ ምሕደራን ከምኡ’ውን ኣብ ቻርተር ሕቡራት ሃገራት ተንጸባሪቑ ዝርከብ መሳጢ መትከላት፡ ዝበዝሕ እዋን ብዘይሕጋዊ ኣሰራርሓን ሽርሒታትን ምስ ተኸርደነ’ዩ። ዓበይቲ ጉዳያት ዓለማዊ ሰላም ኣብ ሕጋውያን ኣህጉራዊ ኣካላት ቀሪቡ ዝርኣዩለን ብይን ዝረኽበሉን ኩነት የለን። ኣብ ክንድኡ ኪዳናትን ጥምረት

ገለ ወገናትን ዓጋቲ ሓይሊ ብምዃን፡ ኣህጉራዊ ሕጊ ንምጥሓስ ምሩጽ መሳርሒ ኮይኑ ይርከብ።

ዘይሕጋዊን በይናዊን እገዳታት፡ ብኣመሪካ ዝዕብለሉ ፋይናንስያዊ፡ ቁጠባዊን ፍርዳዊን ትካላት ከም ኣጽዋር ምግልጋልን ካልእ ኣብ ማህደሮም ዘሎ መቕጽዒ መሳርሒታትን፡ ትእዛዞም ዘይቅበሉ ወገናት ንምግራፍ ወግሐ ጸብሐ ዝጥቀምሎም እዮም። ሞራላዊ ባይታ ንምርካብ ድማ፡ እዞም ዓምጸጽቲን እኩያትን ፖሊሲታት ብመሳጢ ሓረጋት ተዃሓሒሎም፡ በቶም ሰፊሕ ዝርግሐ ዘለዎም ምእዙዛት ሚድያታቶም ብጻዕቂ ይጋውሑ።

የግዳስ፡ ምስዚ ኹሉ ሃልኪ፡ እዚ ማእዝኑ ዝሰሓተ ሓደገኛ ፖሊስታት ኣብ ኩሉ ኩርናዓት ዓለም ዓርጣም ህዝባዊ ተቓውሞ እናፈጠረ ይመጽእ ኣሎ።

ውሑዳት ንጎድኒ ኣጸጊዕካ፡ ዝለዓለ ባህጊ ወዲ-ሰብ ብጥቕልሉ፡ ርትዒን ግዝኣተ ሕጊን ዝነግሰሉ፡ ኣብ ምኽባር ናጽነትን ልኡላውነትን ሃገራት ዝምስረት፡ ንህዝብታት ርህራሀ ዘለዎ ማሕበራዊ ፍትሒ ዝማእገሩ ፋይዳ ዘለዎ ምዕሩይ ሽርከነትን ምትሕብባርን ዘረጋግጽ ቅኑዕን ፍትሓዊን ግሎባዊ ስርዓት ክህሉ’ዩ።

እዚ ገና ቅርጺ ዘይሓዘ ባህጊን ምንቅስቓሳትን ክጽዒ፡ ኣብ ዝመጽእ ወሰንቲ ዓመታት ልዑል ምውህሃድ ክጠልብ እዩ። ነዞም ክብርታትን ባህግታትን እዚኣቶም ዝቋደሱ ከም ‘ብሪክስ’ ይኹን ካልኦት ኣህጉራዊ ውድባትን መድረኻትን ከኣ፡ ርጡብ ዕላማታትን ስትራተጂታትን ኣነጺሮም ብምቕያስ ሓላፍነቶም ክሰከሙ ይግባእ።

ርጡቡን ሓባራዊ መረዳእታ ዝሰረቱን ቅጥዒ ዝረዓመ ለባም ኣቀራርባ፡ ነቲ ኣብ ማህደሮም ዘሎ እከይ ስጉምቲታት ናይ ጸቕጢ ዓዂሊሉ ከምዘድንኖ ርጉጽ እዩ።

ኣብዚ መዳይ’ዚ፡ ብዝተፈላለየ ሕርያ መጻውርን ፍጥነትን ዝስጉም ዘሎ ምልቓቕ ካብ ዶላር፡ ብቐጻሊ ውህደት ናብ ሓባራዊ ስጉምቲ ኣምሪሑ፡ ግጭታት ከወግድ ዝኽእል ቅዱው ኣህጉራዊ መድረኽ ክፈጥር ዝኽእል’ዩ።

ግጭታት ኣብ ዝነትጒሉ፡ ኣብ ፍትሓዊን ሓቛፍን ውሳነ ዘብጽሑ ኣልያታት ክፍጠሩ ይኽእሉ። ብተመሳሳሊ፡ ዕድላት ውሁድን ኣድማዒን ስጉምቲ፡ ነቲ ዘይዓግብ ጥሙሖም ከርውዩ ዘማዕበልዎ፡ ኣጽዋር ኮይኑ ዘገልግሎም ዘሎ፡ ምስ ኣህጉራዊ ሕጊን ቻርተር ሕቡራት ሃገራትን ዘይቃዶ ቄናን ፍርዳዊን ካልእን መሳርሒታት ኣብ ምቕናዕ ልዑል ግደ ክጻወት ይኽእል።

የቐንየለይ!

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Welcome Back, Your Excellency!

Post by Zmeselo » 26 Aug 2023, 11:37






Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Welcome Back, Your Excellency!

Post by Zmeselo » 26 Aug 2023, 12:23



GENERAL
Violence Against Eritrean Communities Underscores the Hypocrisy of the West

By: Bana Negusse

https://shabait.com/2023/08/26/violence ... eaPrevails

Aug 26, 2023

Late last week, Eritrea Profile published,
Words Matter: Double Standards in Mainstream Media,
a well-written article by Afabet Gebretinsae that decries media coverage of the recent spate of crime and terror perpetrated against peaceful Eritrean festivals in cities across the West.

Not long after, The Grayzone, an independent news website producing original investigative journalism, released the article,
Western media glorifies TPLF mob violence against Eritrean festivals,
an enlightening commentary that similarly raised critical questions about how mainstream media in the West have reported recent events.

These articles are not only extremely important in helping to shed light on the ongoing challenges faced by Eritrean communities in the diaspora, but are also vital in countering the dominant – yet enormously flawed – narratives and frameworks surrounding the attacks on festivals and Eritrea more broadly. Building upon the many valuable points and insights raised within the articles, the following paragraphs present several additional points worth noting about the deeply concerning pattern of violence, hate speech, and terror against peaceful Eritrean communities across the West.

Hypocrisy and cynicism

First, one can only observe in awe the astounding levels of hypocrisy and cynicism exhibited by Western states in recent weeks. These states never hesitate to pontificate about the fundamental importance of “freedom of speech and assembly”, as they pompously lecture Eritrea – and the rest of Africa – about the presumed absence of these “freedoms”. Yet, as has been so richly demonstrated in recent days and weeks, so many of these Western countries have also not dithered in denying these exact same freedoms to their own citizens (i.e., those who originally come from Eritrea) as the latter seek to come together in celebration of the rich history and culture of their origin nation.

While peaceful festivals and law-abiding groups exercising their rights should never be the targets of illegal threats and violence, Western authorities have frequently revoked permits in response to attacks, thus appeasing the perpetrators of violent terror and doubly punishing victims. For the West, Eritrean celebrations, which are rooted in a proud history that extends back many decades, cannot be permitted, because they only serve to powerfully illustrate how truly hollow and utterly groundless the prevailing mainstream narrative of Eritrea actually is.

Xenophobia and racism will increase

Another unfortunate implication of the recent attacks is that they will undoubtedly add fuel to the already high levels of xenophobia, discrimination, and racism against minorities and migrants in the West. Populists, far-right movements, and radical groups, which have been steadily on the march during recent years, will latch on to these deplorable events and recycle a variety of harmful tropes and stereotypes to drive their toxic, exclusionary agenda. Although the overwhelming majority of Eritreans have historically been hard-working, law-abiding citizens who have made substantive, diverse contributions to their host communities, the complexities and nuances of recent events will be totally lost or overlooked, leaving entirely innocent groups to not only be demonized but also exposed to greater hostility and new threats.

Eritrean resilience and unity in the face of adversity

One of the underlying aims of the recent violence targeting Eritrean festivals is to divide Eritrean communities, weaken solidarity, and harm the nation. History, however, offers an instructive guide: during times of hardship, grave injustice, and immense odds, Eritreans do not wilt. Nor do they crumble.

During the period under Italian colonial rule, Eritreans were subjected to forced servitude, apartheid, and an array of indignities. Later, in the 1940s, the British military administration in Eritrea proceeded to strip away and plunder much of the latter’s industry and infrastructure, while also aiming to sow local division, stoke discord and tension, and incite communal violence.

Subsequently, contrary to principles espoused by the United Nations and unlike the other Italian colonies that received independence at the end of World War II, Eritrea was federated with Ethiopia as
an autonomous unit…under the sovereignty of the Ethiopian Crown.
As the federal structure was steadily dismantled before Eritrea was eventually annexed, Eritreans were subjected to state repression, violence, and persecution, while all forms of civil disobedience, opposition, dissent, and resistance, which had largely been peaceful and involved broad segments of the Eritrean population, were forcefully crushed.

Afterward, during the decades-long independence struggle, Eritrea received no substantive international economic, political, or military support, and it was confronted by one of the continent’s largest and best-equipped militaries. Throughout the duration of the protracted conflict, Ethiopia was heavily backed by the Cold War superpowers, the US and USSR (alternatingly and at times simultaneously), as well as many other countries, including, among others, Israel, East Germany, Cuba, and Yemen. Finally, following independence, Eritrea faced a large-scale war of aggression aiming at regime change and rolling back its independence, followed by a lengthy illegal military occupation and persistent armed incursions, a harsh, unjust sanctions regime, and a raft of coercive measures.

Throughout this history of tremendous adversity and injustice, one common thread has been that Eritreans have stayed resilient, remained steadfast, closed ranks, and kept moving forward.

The abject failure of longstanding Western policies against Eritrea

There is a preponderance of evidence, indicating that much of the violence being perpetrated against Eritrean communities in the diaspora is actually orchestrated and funded by TPLF-affiliated groups. It is also increasingly apparent, that some Western institutions and officials have played a supportive or facilitative role. These facts underscore, the sheer dysfunction and utter failure of the West’s years-long policy of “strategic depopulation” against Eritrea.

Recall that following the failed attempts to force “regime change’’ and erase Eritrean independence through military invasion (during the 1998-2000 war), the TPLF and its principal benefactors initiated a multifaceted effort to achieve their aims via less direct routes. This included,
isolation, destabilization, sanctions and economic warfare, vilification and psychological operations, and degrading the country’s ability to develop or defend itself.
These subterfuges, were accompanied by a massive financial injection – to the tune of $US40 billion – to prop up and “lionize” the TPLF regime.

Another critical dimension of the “full spectrum press” against Eritrea was the targeting of its human resources, particularly its youth. The aim was to wean the youth from national service in order to downgrade Eritrea’s defense and developmental capabilities, as well as to create “opposition groups”.

Eritrea’s law on national service was enacted in 1992, in the immediate aftermath of the country’s long war for independence. The original law was amended in 1995 and enacted as: Proclamation 82/1995. The 18-month-long national service – which may be prolonged in times of war – is a critical national institution. Not only does it ensure national security and defense, but it also promotes development, raises human capital, helps instill key socio-cultural values among participants, and fosters cohesion and nation-building within a highly diverse, multi-faith, multi-ethnic country. Accordingly, for Eritrea’s arch-enemies, targeting the institution assumed massive significance. The presumption was that if the national service could successfully be hollowed out and weakened, Eritrea’s defense capabilities would be severely impaired.

The principal conduit for implementing this malicious policy was the UNHCR, which established a series of “Eligibility Guidelines” advocating for the extension of
blanket asylum rights to all Eritrean migrants,
especially the youth and national service members.

Although these unprecedented measures were issued supposedly to
assist decision-makers, including UNHCR staff, Governments and private practitioners in assessing the protection needs of Eritrean asylum-seekers,
they were characterized by glaring errors, exaggerated and fabricated information, and a complete lack of context.

Notably, the UNHCR also worked closely with TPLF officials and its refugee arm: the ARRA.

The UNHCR’s Guidelines, assiduously accompanied by explicit campaigns to encourage Eritrean youth to cross over to neighboring countries from which they would be “resettled” in third countries – usually Europe, Canada, Australia, and the US – have been the principal factor behind disproportionate migration of Eritreans during the past years.

Indeed, tens of thousands of other Africans; including Ethiopians, Sudanese, Somalis, and others, were also prompted to seek refugee status posing as Eritreans due to the perceived ease of acquiring refugee status under this label. At one point in time, the Austrian Ambassador to Ethiopia confirmed that 60% of refugees in Austria were in fact Ethiopians posing as Eritreans. This was not a unique or outlying case, but actually a broad representation of the prevailing reality in other Western countries.

However, the West’s pernicious policy has not worked. Its abject failure is unambiguously reflected not only in the resilience of Eritrean communities and their strengthened loyalty to and unwavering solidarity with their homeland, but also in the leading role played by non-Eritrean thugs and their Western accomplices in recent attacks on Eritrean festivals.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Welcome Back, Your Excellency!

Post by Zmeselo » 26 Aug 2023, 15:28


President, Isaias Afwerki

11 Key Insights from President Isaias’s Historic Address at BRICS 2023 Summit

By Larmbert Ebitu

https://africainterest.org/11-key-insig ... 23-summit/

August 26, 2023

Our global community is at a veritable crossroads.


That was the opening line of President Isaias’s address, https://shabait.com/2023/08/24/remarks- ... cs-summit/ after courtesies at the BRICS 2023 summit. And with that, the president of Eritrea proceeded to deliver an address that, despite its brevity, historians will long remember as the most significant address of the event. Its content, if carefully examined, could fill volumes of books. The address not only justified why many purred over his esteemed participation in BRICS summit https://africainterest.org/why-brics-su ... s-afwerki/ even before it began, but it also underscored how one can never really grasp the full significance of such a great personality. But just how impactful was his address?

Naturally, deconstructing an address as iconic as this one, particularly in the immediate aftermath, is nearly impossible. Only diligent historians composing their accounts in decades to come, and leveraging the benefit of hindsight, will stand a chance to fully fathom the visionary observations embedded within it. For now, we can only be certain that, if the world takes heed of President Isaias’s insights, posterity will celebrate how he steered the present away from a “perilous path” towards
a just and equitable global order…
Otherwise, future historians will decry how we missed our chance to halt our “global village” from hurtling down the precipice of unprecedented disaster.

In either scenario, history will record how President Isaias’s prophetic foresight foreshadowed developments.

Simply put, one cannot fully appreciate President Isaias’s address at the BRICS Summit 2023 without the benefit of time. Still, we must attempt to see it today, as future historians will, even if only to peep at the future he envisioned. Below, are the 10 key insights.

Acknowledgment of Critical Global Situation

Saying that
our global community is at a veritable crossroads,
might seem as unremarkable as any other to someone with little political awareness of current world events.

However, when you juxtapose it with the current state of the world, the profound implications become evident. From the outset, President Isaias draws attention to the pivotal moment of decision and choice that confronts the world. He fully captures the seriousness of the hour in urging the BRICS alliance to make critical decisions and take proactive measures to chart the future. Those choices, he implies, will carry far-reaching consequences, not only shaping the trajectory of BRICS but also leaving an indelible mark on the broader scope of global affairs.

Critique of Prevailing Global Governance Architecture

Once the seriousness of the hour is set, President Isaias delves into the flaws undermining the current global governance architecture. He elaborates on how the framework’s dysfunctionality, non-inclusive nature, and unfair regulations hinder its effectiveness. By characterizing these issues as
too evident to merit emphasis,
he emphasizes their seriousness and draws attention to the disconnect between the existing rules governing international relations and the ever-evolving dynamics of nations.

President Isaias essentially proposes that BRICS, empowered by its burgeoning economic and geopolitical influence, should champion equitable global governance structures. These structures should ensure the fair representation of emerging economies and address the concerns of developing nations.

Impact of US Exceptionalism

Not one to mince his words, President Isaias wastes no time to reveal what is at the heart of the dysfunctional Global Governance Architecture hindering global progress over the past century. It is, to quote him,
US Exceptionalism
or
PAX AMERICANA,
he says, fearlessly observing how the dominance of the US has resulted in an unbalanced distribution of influence and authority, overlooking principles of fair representation, inclusivity, and cooperation among nations.

In this context, President Isaias not only acknowledges BRICS’ potential to champion multipolar collaboration but also challenges its members to eschew exceptionalism. This message holds particular relevance for BRICS, as the allure of exceptionalism can be tempting, especially for economically and politically powerful members of the alliance, like China, Russia, and India.

Consequences of Bi-polarity and Uni-polarity

President Isaias’s address then veers toward the repercussions of bi-polarity and uni-polarity, revealing the pitfalls of these power dynamics. He explains how these approaches have historically resulted in conflicts and instability — an
endless spiral of conflicts and perpetual instability,
as he highlights.

Coming from a man hailed as a pioneer of multipolarity, we can only understand this as a distinct call for BRICS to counterbalance prevailing power dynamics. In this sense, he sees BRICS as a promising alternative to uni-polarity, with the potential to usher in multipolarity. This, however, necessitates avoiding the pitfalls of the former and demonstrating the benefits of collaborative decision-making and equal partnership.

Squandering Opportunities for Global Progress

President Isaias then emphasizes, the missed opportunities for cultivating meaningful partnerships among nations and ensuring equitable benefits for all. He touches on the unrealized potential of technological advancements, as a shared public good. The underlying message is that by ethically harnessing these advancements for the betterment of humanity, a fair and just global order could have been established. Given what we know of President Isaias’s forward-thinking mentality, we can only here, see a man who recognizes BRICS’ diverse representation of nations with immense potential for collaboration, technological advancement, and economic growth. His message here is simply that BRICS members need to harness their collective strengths, foster meaningful partnerships, harness technological progress, and establish inclusive frameworks for global cooperation.

Proponents of Hegemony Pushing for Disaster

Upon urging members to harness their collective strengths for shared progress, President Isaias proceeds to caution them against succumbing to hegemonic tendencies. He delivers a stark reminder of the perils associated with unchecked dominance, emphasizing how such behaviors can lead to catastrophic consequences for international stability. In a sense, this is an exhortation for the BRICS alliance to proactively counteract the negative impacts of hegemonic tendencies by advocating for multipolarity and inclusivity. Through such concerted efforts, he clearly sees the alliance playing a pivotal role in preventing, rather than perpetuating, disastrous conflicts and power struggles.

Concerns About Escalation of War in Ukraine

President Isaias then substantiates his criticism of hegemonic tendencies and its consequences, by pointing to the escalation of conflicts, particularly in Ukraine. He underscores the critical role of dialogue and conflict mediation, in preventing these tensions from escalating into full-scale confrontations. This concern holds significant importance for BRICS seeing as some of its leading members- including Russia and China- are confronting such situations. The way forward, President Isaias thinks, is peaceful resolutions and multilateral diplomacy as essential tools for counterbalancing the escalation of those conflicts. Thus, BRICS, he suggests, can play a key role in ensuring global stability by fostering open dialogue and advocating for negotiated settlements.

Effects of Wars and Unilateral Actions on the World

He then follows on BRICS role in ensuring global security, by delving into the profound and far-reaching repercussions of wars and unilateral actions. Here, he is basically saying that beyond fostering open dialogue and advocating for a negotiated settlement, BRICS must embrace multipolarity and collaboration as core values in order to effectively address the negative repercussions of wars, etc actions. With the experience of himself and country, Eritrea, having been victims of unilateral actions by Western powers, President Isaias issues a clear challenge to BRICS. He urges the alliance to champion collective decision-making and adherence to international law, as essential strategies for mitigating the impact of conflicts and unilateral measures.

Niger situation symptomatic of modern slavery

Still, on conflicts, President Isaias seizes the opportunity of this highly publicized summit to address the Niger situation for the first time. Never a man given to the superficial or performative politics of making statements to gain attention, but always only speaking out when he believes his words can impact, the BRICS summit was the perfect moment. He utilized it not only to draw attention to the conflict but also to insinuate its broader implications. He characterized it as “symptomatic” of “modern slavery,” by alluding to Europe’s looting of Niger oil, and in effect, presenting Niger’s predicament as not isolated but emblematic of systemic challenges facing nations in the developing world; particularly within Africa.

Aspirations for a Just and Fair Global Order

As his address draws to a close, President Isaias eloquently paints his enduring vision for a global order characterized by justice and equity, underlining the ethical foundations of international relations. He tells of aspirations for a world where principles of justice, the rule of law, and collaborative cooperation form the bedrock. Aligned with these noble ideals, President Isaias urges the BRICS member countries to align their policies and actions with this vision, champion equitable economic development, safeguard human rights, and uphold the inviolability of sovereignty.

What we must do to accelerate de-dollarization

President Isaias concludes his address, by addressing the issue of de-dollarization. He decries, the hegemonistic dominance of the US dollar and highlights the necessity for a more diversified and equitable global financial framework. This sentiment aligns with his previous critique of the prevailing global governance structure, which favors specific nations at the expense of others. Beyond this, President Isaias’s emphasis on de-dollarization underscores his conviction in the inviolability of economic sovereignty for nations. He, in effect, rallies the BRICS countries to move beyond reliance on the US dollar and to supplement the measures of de-dollarization already on the offing by continuous consensus building, etc.





_______________






Post Reply