Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Abe Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 14412
Joined: 05 Jun 2013, 13:00

Khaled Al-Hawari: The World Cup was the straw that broke the camel's back.. The resurgence of Islamophobia

Post by Abe Abraham » 30 Nov 2022, 02:41

  • Khaled Al-Hawari: The World Cup was the straw that broke the camel's back.. The resurgence of Islamophobia

    Nations rise and derive their survival by their ability to merge with the world and accept the other, and this acceptance does not necessarily have to be the imitation of the other and the application of its culture in society, or the reproduction of these cultural values ​​that contradict religion, customs and traditions.

    A sane person cannot ask for such a demand, but at least it is imperative Awareness, and responsibility imposes on the media to develop a national educational program not to exploit global events in announcing hostility and ridicule of values ​​that other societies consider the most important elements of the civilizational renaissance, which has become an integral part of the concept of coexistence in a world that has become one electronic village, especially if the matter is related to an occasion.

    This is the equation that the Arab peoples have not yet understood and absorbed in light of the political, economic and cultural pressures that are inherited from generation to generation, starting from home to school and university and ending with sitting in a coffee shop, and the emergence of social media that brought out the worst. The minds in Arab societies, despite their fragility, now give themselves the right to draw future policies.


    Israel, although it is a religious state whose biblical doctrine governs all its daily practices, not only refuses to acknowledge the existence of the other, but rather considers eliminating him, usurping his land, stealing and desecrating his personal property as a religious obligation that it is keen to consolidate in the mentality of the Jewish generations, starting from the nursery homes until carrying arms in the street and the assassination of passers-by on the road are well understood through its intelligence services and cultural institutions, and the awareness of the Jewish person himself in seeing the future, the steps to participate in this deceptive game, and those who follow the Israeli social media discover the extent to which the Israeli person is keen to appear as a civilized intellectual, whether in what he writes Or responding to others who differ with him in opinion, and of course it is not just a difference in opinion on the part of the Arabs who mix religion with morals and extract all the alphabets of obscenity in the dictionary of the Arabic language, and always present themselves as a partner to the European peoples in culture and modernity, and falsely claim their association with the world With the same cultural values, the Zionist financial institutions succeeded in controlling and dominating the film production markets to consolidate this image through

    There are huge cinematic works that show the Arab man in the appearance of a backward anti-civilization person who deals with sex as the first priority of life and does not hesitate to have sex with a camel, and we discover at the same time that the teenage Arab rulers scatter money in buying yachts and private planes, and recruit pens and clerics to settle disputes Between each other, their wives compete in plastic surgeries, and follow fashion by contracting with the most famous and expensive international fashion houses, although they are not equal in beauty and elegance to the level of a simple European worker in a restaurant.

    Israel used the money to buy a lot of European and American media to consolidate these deceptive ideas, so it won global popular sympathy as a civilized country in the midst of the siege of barbaric societies that want to eliminate them, not because it is an occupying entity that usurped the land and terrorized its people in the worst forms of murder and terrorism, but rather because it is a civilized country that is exposed to a religious war. Cultural and civilizational persecution.

    The unknown is the fate that awaits the harvest of Qatar’s relationship with the European peoples after the end of the World Cup, which has re-discussed Islamophobia as a public opinion that has become unanimously agreed upon by the European peoples.

    It has Qatar’s laws regarding raising flags of [deleted]*x*uality, which is in fact not a new emergency phenomenon, and [deleted]*x*uals do not seek to promote themselves in Qatar. of Arab artwork within the context of its existence as a natural condition in society.

    And a simple reading of Arab newspapers and magazines reveals the events related to this issue in a way that reveals its presence in abundance, and it is not specific to a specific class level, but in the midst of all social classes, in addition to the fact that alcohol consumption “beer” is not prohibited in many Arab capitals, and it is presented legally in Hotels and restaurants are also sold in markets, and are available to everyone, unlike European societies that set strict rules to prevent adolescents under the legal age from buying and consuming alcohol of all kinds.

    The world considered that the exploitation of a global sporting event, and the reduction of the harmony and convergence of different cultures to a mere arena for religious promotion, an attempt at ideological polarization, and the intellectual influence of the masses who traveled to support their country’s national teams, the vast majority of whom are in the youth stage, is a violation of the regulatory terms and rules that Qatar was aware of when it applied.

    Organizing the competition and the contract are the law of the contracting parties. This is if we consider that Qatar’s victory in organizing this competition is not surrounded by suspicions, just as it was due to accidental media gains that overthrew the For the initiatives and conferences through which the official Arab religious institutions have tried for many years in the face of the image drawn by religious extremism in the world, to show Islam's tolerance, its non-interference in other faiths, and its respect for the cultures of peoples.

    From the first moment of the start of the World Cup in Qatar, the state of anger sweeping the European street worsened and rolled like a snowball, and what it will leave behind in the European psyche, and it will remain in the memory for years much greater than the ability of the Qatari regime, which spent billions to improve its image before the world during the years of the Arab Quartet blockade against Containing it, rather, it will extend to Islam in general, and it will reflect on Muslims in the West and their places of worship in light of the rotation of the gears of the Western media machines to incite decision-makers to take decisions that will confuse what almost the majority of European peoples considered a message of Qatari persecution and racism towards issues that they consider affecting personal freedom that has struggled For the sake of these peoples, and they paid heavy prices to achieve them, and between political and economic relations and investment with Qatar, and strengthening its positions within global political institutions.

    The issue that is extremely important is that the Arab world, including those claiming to be culture, deals with world events as a “battle for the coffee shop” and that the winner is the one who is fluent in the language of “political extremism”, despite freedom of opinion and personal freedom as a moral approach, regardless of the difference and disagreement.

    It is considered one of the sacred things in European societies, ..... Societies that are originally Christian societies accepted these actions within the framework of freedom of opinion, and the makers of these films were not subjected to threats and assassinations.

    So if the Qatari regime had succeeded with these emotional decisions in settling its differences with the Arab and Islamic peoples who were temporarily viewing Qatari policy with suspicion and suspicion, and considered the presence of the US military base as evidence of Qatar’s departure from the historical connection with its Arab nation, rebellion against its religious belief, and supporting it with money And the media for what was known as the Arab Spring, and its clear and explicit role in Egypt and the allocation of a news channel for Egyptian events that specialized in live broadcasting of Tahrir Square throughout the night and day, and its military role in Libya and what led to it after the participation of a Qatari military battalion in the storming of Bab Al-Azizia, and if Qatar is now due to the emotional view With which the Arab peoples deal with issues, they have become, overnight, the protector of Islam and the renewal of the glories of Arabism.

    These are fake slogans and temporary glories, and they will end with the first disagreement between Qatar and an Arab country.

    On the other side, which is more important, it has entered itself into a dilemma and crisis with the European peoples. And the American, and human rights and freedoms organizations, and closed the way completely to any attempt by an Arab or Islamic country to host the World Cup in the future.




Fiyameta
Senior Member
Posts: 12619
Joined: 02 Aug 2018, 22:59

Re: Khaled Al-Hawari: The World Cup was the straw that broke the camel's back.. The resurgence of Islamophobia

Post by Fiyameta » 30 Nov 2022, 03:41

It is difficult to understand what message the author is trying to convey when he uses one sentence to write an entire paragraph. :|

Abe Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 14412
Joined: 05 Jun 2013, 13:00

Re: Khaled Al-Hawari: The World Cup was the straw that broke the camel's back.. The resurgence of Islamophobia

Post by Abe Abraham » 30 Nov 2022, 05:52

Fiyameta wrote:
30 Nov 2022, 03:41
It is difficult to understand what message the author is trying to convey when he uses one sentence to write an entire paragraph. :|
I noticed your point once I read the result of my Google translation. Nevertheless I decided to put it here because I found the topic in its Arabic version very interesting. Qatar spent a lot money to do two conflicting things. ክፈትዉኻ እንዳ ደለኻ ከመይ ጌርካ ከም ዝጸልኡኻ ትገብር?
  • His message is this :

    1_Qatar brought the Word Cup to the Arab and Islamic world to demonstrate to the international community that Arabs and muslims share human values of tolerance and embrace modernity.

    2_Qatar conscious of its image in the Arab and Islamic world as an instrument of the United States ( military base in Doha,its involvement in Libya,using Al-jazeera to serve Western interest ) in the last minute decided to put itself forward as a defender of the Islamic values through its opposition to the display of the LGBT symbol and the consumption of alcohol on its soil.

    3_ The last two things which concern the core elements of the so-called Western values of freedom with freedom of speech as essential component of it brought the Western societies in confrontation with Qatar and the larger Islamic world leading to the revival of Islamophobia as a practice and discussion topic. That was not the aim of Qatar in the first place, was it ?

    4_ Conclusion : The wrong approach of Qatar and its ephemeral and deceptive role as a defender of Islamic values will have enduring negative consequences on immigrant muslim communities in the West ( extremists in the West could push anti-immigrant policies and defend those policies by stating immigrant should respect the Western values that apply in Western countries. In other words : adopt our values or leave! ) and Arab and muslim countries who have plans to bring WC to their countries.

    According to the writer tolerance doesn't have to mean that you have to accept all the values of others but you can always devise some accommodations like allowing foreigners to drink alcohol in designated places as it is already the case with Hotels and their room services. As far as the LGBT symbol is concerned you could tolerate it as long as its role is limited to being a sign of solidarity and tolerance and not an instrument of propagation of hoxmosxexuality and related ways of life.

-

Post Reply