Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Imagine a book to be written about you, at age 21.

Post by Zmeselo » 23 Jun 2021, 08:02


Title: "Everything you need to know about Alexander Isak", 170 pages


___________________________





European Football Championship 2021
Poland's national team captain: "Isak is Europe's best counterattack player"

Johan Flinck, Petra Thorén

https://www.aftonbladet.se/sportbladet/ ... ngsspelare

(Software translation)



S:T PETERSBURG: Last in line to join the tribute choir to Alexander Isak?

Poland's national team captain, Paulo Sousa.
Isak is probably Europe's best counterattack player,
says the veteran Portuguese major player.

There is no talk, about who the Poles fear most tonight in the Swedish team.


Paulo Sousa
Alexander Isak is a key in the rapid, Swedish changes,
says their national team captain Paulo Sousa and continues:
He is probably Europe's best counterattack player, with ball and without ball. Because he is so fast and has such nice individual qualities, especially one-on-one but also one-on-one ... three if there are surfaces.
Jealous of Janne

Midfielder Mateusz Klich is also impressed with Isak.
He is a fantastic forward, he is very fast and he is very good at dribbling. Our main goal is to stop him so he can not speed up his game.
Isak is obviously a player we must focus on. In the match against Slovakia, he dribbled as he wanted and was the biggest threat in Sweden,
says Klich.


Coach, Janne Andersson

Sousa, who took over as national team captain in Poland in January and had his first collection in March, seems jealous of Janne Andersson, who has been Swedish national team captain for five years.
It is a mature and cohesive team, that has played 62 matches under Janne Andersson.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Imagine a book to be written about you, at age 21.

Post by Zmeselo » 23 Jun 2021, 10:24



Kem Semai’n Meret: Extending the Conversation on Development Projects

By: Dr. Fikrejesus Amahazion

https://shabait.com/2021/06/23/kem-sema ... -projects/

GENERAL

Jun 23, 2021



The last edition of Eritrea Profile (published on Saturday 19 June) featured a very interesting article entitled, “Transforming Arid Zones into Wetlands”. Written by Kesete Ghebrehiwet and part of a larger series that explores major development undertakings in Eritrea’s Western Development Zone, the article is full of details and it sheds important light on a critical aspect of Eritrea’s national development efforts. I certainly found the piece to be highly informative and can only recommend that everyone takes a moment to read it, when they have the opportunity. It is well worth your time. In the following few paragraphs, I offer a deeper look at some of the points raised in the recent article, sharing some general thoughts and hoping to extend the conversation.

To begin, one of the main reasons I especially appreciated and greatly enjoyed the recent article was because of its broad focus: Eritrea’s rural areas and people. This is important for several reasons. Too often, when we think of and talk about developing countries (or many countries for that matter), we tend to restrict our thinking and discussions to national capitals or large urban areas. This emphasis or “urban bias” is frequently guided by an underlying sense or belief that these areas are the only places that matter or are somehow of greater importance and more significant. Rural areas and populations generally are undervalued, remaining almost forgotten and basically an afterthought. Unfortunately, there can also sometimes be a harmful accompanying sentiment where rural areas and people are disdainfully looked down upon and considered backward or uncivilized.

However, we must keep in mind the fact that most of the developing world – including Eritrea (60%) – is rural. Rural areas and people are an integral part of our societies and they are vital cogs within our economies. According to the International Labour Organization, over half (with some estimates suggesting as high as two-thirds) of Africa’s population live and work in rural areas, which offer huge land surfaces. Moreover, agriculture represents approximately 65-70% of jobs in Sub-Saharan Africa (corresponding figure with Eritrea is 60%). Thus, Kesete’s recent article, focusing on rural areas and communities in Eritrea, is positive and significant. Not only does it help us to learn more about these lesser known, sometimes overlooked regions and populations, it also encourages us to value and appreciate how pivotal and important they truly are to our society.



Another significant point to note in relation to the article, is the fact that many of the projects and initiatives described (such as dams) are highly effective and functional. They are not simple vanity projects or what are often called, “tsada harmauz” (“white elephants”) projects. As a brief reminder, white elephant projects are typically large, expensive infrastructure projects that focus more on flash or prestige than efficiency or function. Found across many parts of Africa and the developing world (although not solely restricted to these areas), white elephant projects are often poorly designed and constructed, take “forever” to build, end up as ineffective or fail to fulfill their original projected purpose, and become very expensive to maintain. It is also quite common to eventually find them sitting idle or get targeted for removal.

In contrast, however, the projects outlined and described in the recent article have been a
driving force for an improvement in the living standards of local communities [in Eritrea].
For instance, they have provided local communities with sufficient water supply for their households and to irrigate their farms. In addition, the projects have brought the convenience of electricity to communities, helping to improve quality of life and supporting education (e.g., many surrounding schools have begun to offer computer classes to students, thus enhancing lessons, while young students with electricity at home have been able to study or complete their homework in the evenings through the benefit of light).

The extent of the positive changes and developments arising from the projects described in Kesete’s article were captured in a memorable conversation that I had, not too long ago, in a small village outside of Asmara. While eating a traditional meal with a group of men, women, and children from the village, I asked them about how exactly a local dam had impacted them or the community. “We are blessed,” they responded excitedly in unison and without a moment of hesitation.
The change in our lives is amazing…it is like night and day.
The success and effectiveness of the various projects outlined in the recent article, are rooted in several different factors. One is that the projects can only be constructed after a long, comprehensive process of deep study and investigation. Prior to their construction, potential projects must pass a rigorous analysis process where justification for their demand and need must be clearly demonstrated, while the size and type of projects must be shown to be in alignment with their site conditions and objectives. Moreover, the possible environmental and socio-economic impacts of projects are closely studied, ensuring that they will not have any significant harmful impacts on communities and the environment.

Additionally, over many years of constructing hundreds of dams, catchments, and other development projects of all types and sizes, Eritrea has acquired a considerable amount of experience, learned important lessons, developed useful innovations, and also extracted key insights from international partners. This has not only contributed to improved design and construction capability, it has also led to a better ability to address potential issues, challenges, or complexities, substantial reductions in cost, considerable improvements in project safety, and significantly shortened construction times.

Finally, the overall success and effectiveness of projects has also been an outgrowth of the fact that projects are not solely led and implemented by technical experts and engineers. Instead, local communities are heavily involved, participating in idea generation and proposals, planning, construction, and management of projects (e.g., through open discussions and contributions of cash, kind, and labor). As a result of active community support and involvement, the various development projects have been responsive to the direct needs and concerns of the local people. Moreover, general success and long-term sustainability has been promoted since communities take responsibility, are empowered, and retain a sense of ownership.


_______________________



Q&A with Chinese Ambassador to Eritrea

By: Sirak Habtemichael

https://shabait.com/2021/06/23/qa-with- ... eaPrevails

Q & A

Jun 23, 2021



On July one this year, China will commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party of China. On this occasion, our Q&A column had the honor of interviewing the Ambassador of the Peoples’ Republic of China to Eritrea, H.E. Cai Ge.

Q: The year 2021, marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. What major historic contributions has the Communist Party of China made, to China and the rest of the world?

A: July 1 of 2021, marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. Over the past 100 years, the Communist Party of China (CPC) has led the Chinese people through the arduous struggle to achieve a leapfrog from standing up, getting rich to becoming strong. China is now, the second-largest economy and the largest industrial country in the world. More than 800 million Chinese citizens, have been lifted out of poverty. The average life expectancy has increased, from 35 to 77 years old. Under the leadership of the Communist Party of China, China has created two major economic developments and long-term social stability.

China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China is the second-largest fund contributor to the UN peacekeeping operations and has the largest number of peacekeepers, among the permanent members of the UN Security Council. Over the years, China, with 30% contribution to global economic growth, has become the main engine for world economic growth and has brought unprecedented opportunities to world development. Since the outbreak of Covid-19, China is the first major economy to achieve growth. It is predicted that China’s economic growth will reach 8.3% this year. This is an important contribution to promoting the rapid recovery of the world economy.

China has made a great contribution to the global anti-pandemic cause by supplying medical assistance to more than 150 countries and some international organizations and has provided vaccine assistance to more than 80 countries. Furthermore, China has exported vaccines to over 40 countries, with a total of 350 million doses of vaccines to the international community.

With more than 800 million people lifted out of poverty, China has achieved the poverty alleviation goal of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 10 years ahead of schedule, contributing more than 70% to the world’s poverty reduction. China has established and improved the world’s largest education, social security, and medical system, which can be called a great human rights project and the best human rights practice. China has made important contributions to the cause of human rights in the world.

In terms of addressing climate change, China has also actively fulfilled its commitments, China’s carbon emission intensity per unit GDP in 2018 decreased by 45.8% compared with that in 2005. President Xi Jinping announced last year that China will strive to achieve a carbon peak by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060.

Q: On the occasion of the 100th anniversary, what development programs have the Communist Party of China charted out?

A: In order to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the Communist Party of China has established: “Two Centenary Goals”. The first is to build a moderately prosperous society in all respects, on the 100th anniversary of CPC. In this respect, the Communist Party of China has fulfilled its solemn commitment to the people.

The second Centenary Goal will be achieved by 2049, the year of the 100th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China and it will be realized in two steps: by the year 2035, basically realizing socialist modernization; from the year 2035 to the middle of 21st century, to build China into a prosperous, strong, democratic, culturally advanced, harmonious and beautiful socialist modern country. At that time, China’s material civilization, political civilization, spiritual civilization, social civilization, and ecological civilization will be comprehensively improved. China will become a leading country in terms of comprehensive national strength and international influence. The common prosperity of all people will be basically realized.

The Communist Party of China is fully confident and capable of uniting and leading the Chinese people, to continue to create new development miracles and realize the blueprint for future development. China will create a broader space for all countries in the world to share China’s opportunities, achieve win-win results and common development.

Q.As a major political party that has been thriving for 100 years, what is the key attributes of the Communist Party of China?

A: Over the past 100 years, the Communist Party of China has grown from more than 50 people when it was founded to the world’s largest party with more than 91 million Party members, creating
the greatest political miracle on earth.
The most important magic weapons are: First, the Communist Party of China adheres to the combination of Marxist theory with the practice of Chinese revolution and construction, finds a path suitable for China’s development. The Chinese people are full of confidence in the path, theoretical system, and culture of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

Second, the Communist Party of China adheres to the people-centered position to serve the people wholeheartedly and lead the people to work together. The Communist Party of China, gets full support from the people. According to many polls, more than 90% of the Chinese people are satisfied with the government under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.

Third, the Communist Party of China attaches great importance to the party’s self-construction, emphasizing that the party should manage itself and strictly govern itself to ensure the Party’s advanced nature, purity, and combat effectiveness, and consolidate the foundation of the Party’s ruling.



Q: How do you view the world situation, today?

A: In nowadays’ world, there is the overlapping impact of major changes and global pandemic unseen in a century. Unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism are rampant. Human beings are facing a variety of non-traditional security threats, such as climate change, environmental pollution, and epidemic diseases. International order and world peace are facing severe challenges.

China firmly upholds the international system with the United Nations as the core and the international order based on international law firmly upholds the basic norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and firmly upholds genuine multilateralism of mutual equality and win-win cooperation. China’s diplomacy has always adhered to the principle of equality whatever big or small countries. China opposes power politics, sanctions, and threats of sanctions, and opposes arbitrary interference in other countries’ internal affairs under the excuses of so-called human rights issues.

Human beings live on this very earth, no country can face the challenges alone. The only way to deal with global problems is to build a community of shared futures for all mankind. All countries in the world should strengthen unity and cooperation, take the road of peaceful development, jointly promote the construction of a new type of international relations featuring mutual respect, fairness and justice, and win-win cooperation, and build a world of lasting peace, common security, common prosperity, openness, inclusiveness, cleanness, and beauty.

Q: How do you evaluate the importance and key role of the Chinese government in the African continent, especially in the Horn of Africa?

A: China and Africa are good friends, partners, and brothers. Strengthening solidarity and cooperation with African countries is the unchanging priority of China’s diplomacy. China and African countries support each other on issues, concerning our respective core interests and major concerns. The cooperative achievements between China and Africa, can be seen everywhere in Africa. The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative, has made significant contributions to the local development and the improvement of people’s lives. China has built more than 6000 kilometers of railways, 6000 kilometers of roads, nearly 20 ports, and more than 80 large-scale power facilities in Africa. China has assisted in the construction of more than 130 medical facilities, 45 gymnasiums, and more than 170 schools. China has sent 21,000 members of the medical team to 48 African countries and treated about 220 million African patients. China is a constructive participant in African peace and security affairs and has sent the largest number of peacekeepers, among the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. We support Africa in its effort to solve African problems, independently.

After the outbreak of the pandemic, China and Africa helped each other and united to fight against COVID-19. Not long ago, China and African jointly launched the “Initiative on Partnership for Africa’s Development”. China has never attached political conditions to its corporation or aid to Africa, let alone interfering in Africa’s internal affairs.

China and the countries in the horn of Africa, are good friends. China pays close attention to the situation in the horn of Africa and sincerely hopes that lasting peace and stability can be maintained in the region, so as to realize regional integration and development. China opposes interfering in regional affairs and other countries’ internal affairs under the excuses of, “human rights” and “democracy”. China opposes the implementation of sanctions, or the threat of sanctions. China will continue to play a constructive role in promoting peace, stability, and development in the Horn of Africa.

Q: On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China and the 30th anniversary of Eritrean independence, how do you assess the strong and long relations between the People’s Republic of China and Eritrea?

A: China and Eritrea, have a profound traditional friendship. This friendship was established in the process of striving for national independence and liberation, national development, and construction. Nowadays, our friendship is even stronger than before. China and Eritrea, have always treated each other with respect and equality. We trust each other in politics, support each other on issues concerning our respective core interests and major concerns, and jointly safeguard the interests of both sides and international fairness and justice. The Communist Party of China (CPC) and People’s Front for Democracy and (PFDJ), maintain communications and exchanges of experience in governance. The cooperation between our two sides in infrastructure construction, education, agriculture, health care, human resources, mining, and other fields is fruitful. Projects of friendly cooperation between our two sides can be seen in the capital-Asmara and other cities. During the pandemic, bilateral cooperation has not interrupted and moved forward. For example, the Chinese medical team to Eritrea sticks to their posts together with the Eritrean colleagues in hospitals to help treat the patients. The Chinese Embassy in Eritrea holds two online training courses or seminars every month, on average.

On the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China, China’s development has entered a new stage. The 30th anniversary of Eritrean independence, also ushers in new opportunities for national development. The top leaders of the two Parties have sent congratulatory letters to each other, expressing that they attach great importance to the in-depth development of friendly and cooperative relations between our two countries. Eritrea stressed that infrastructure, energy, transportation, agriculture, health care, and human resources are the key development areas of Eritrea. China has advantages, in the above areas. The two sides have obvious complementary advantages and a solid foundation for cooperation. China is willing to expand and deepen mutually beneficial cooperation, in accordance with the needs of Eritrea and make due contributions to the development of Eritrea and the improvement of Eritrean living standards. Meanwhile, Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) and The Belt and Road Initiative (B&R) have provided new opportunities for bilateral cooperation. In one word, the prospect of deepening cooperation between China and Eritrea is very broad, which will surely yield more fruitful results and further benefit the two peoples. The Chinese Embassy in Eritrea and I will do our best to promote friendly cooperation between our two countries and deepen the friendship between our two peoples.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Imagine a book to be written about you, at age 21.

Post by Zmeselo » 23 Jun 2021, 14:35



The Hypocrisy of the International Community in Managing World Crisis

By: Emmanuel Tsegay

https://raimoq.com/the-hypocrisy-of-the ... ld-crisis/

June 23, 2021



Since colonial times and even possibly before, our world has been marred by wars and conflicts that killed millions of people. Unfortunately, conflicts were not expected to stop even after the end of the devastating Second World War (WWII) that had claimed more than 75 million lives. This prompted world leaders of the time to establish an intergovernmental organization, one of whose mission was to create a peaceful environment by monitoring and managing conflicts around the globe. It’s called the United Nations.

The United Nations (UN) was founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries that said they were committed
to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights.
According to article 39 of the United Nations charter,
the Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The establishment of the UN was certainly a positive development, especially for the states that were disadvantaged and that didn’t have the military capability to defend themselves against the powerful nations. Nonetheless, while at its infancy the United Nations was rendered ineffective in delivering what it was set out to do and fulfilling its mission because it was taken hostage by those that claimed veto power to themselves. To the disappointment of many of the member states, the UN performed poorly in stopping conflicts and maintaining world peace and instead became a tool of destabilizing nations. The cold war era in which the superpower countries of the time: the United States of America (USA) and the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) were on the brink of a nuclear war for geopolitical domination and nations were forced to take sides. The Korean War (1950-1953), the Vietnam war (1955-1975), the Arab – Israeli conflict (1947 – to date), and the three decades long Eritrean war for self-determination (1961-1991) the world witnessed after WWII are but a few of the many conflicts that illustrate the weakness and lack of impartiality of the world body in solving conflicts and maintaining world peace.

To the disappointment of many of the member states, the UN performed poorly in stopping conflicts andmaintaining world peace.


Countries resort to war for various reasons. Some fight over territory while others do so over what they consider are “unfair” trade treaties. Most of the conflicts that occurred in modern history, however, were born out of greed: powerful nations invading resources-rich countries in order to advance their economic and geopolitical hegemony. These “powerful” nations often times use “human rights and democracy” as pretext to make their intervention appear legitimate, thus evade international condemnation. The destructive wars of Iraq, Libya and Syria in which untold number of civilians were killed and historical cities demolished are events of recent history that exemplify acts of global greed to plunder resource-rich countries using lofty slogans such as human rights and terrorism as a pretext. African conflicts like those in Angola, Liberia , Sierra Leone , Somalia, South Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, … were also fueled by the desire of the “powerful” to plunder African resources. In the past several decades when terrorism became a global threat, some autocratic leaders viewed the campaign of “war on terror” as a ‘blessing in disguise’ and an opportunity to build up their military by receiving military and financial support from the wealthy and unprincipled west.

Most of the conflicts that occurred in modern history, however, were born out of greed; powerful nations invading those with resources- rich countries in order to advance their economic and geopolitical hegemony


This article will explore several events of recent history and assess whether the international community (UN) handled these and other similar cases involving armed conflicts in accordance with the international law enshrined in UN charter and will draw a conclusion.

• Case 1. Back on 19 March 2003 the Bush Administration invaded Iraq on the basis of false claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD). It’s to be recalled that former US President George W Bush, the son of the late George Bush Sr. who himself was the president during the first Gulf war calling on countries to help disarm Iraq of the lethal chemical weapon it never “possessed”. Handful states heeded the call and joined the “coalition of the willing” forces in good faith. Eighteen years have elapsed since the initiation of Iraq war and there is to date not a shred of evidence, the Arab country had or was in the process of making WMD. The world was misled and coerced, to say the least. The Middle Eastern nation which is known as one of the old civilizations with remarkable history was utterly destroyed, its antiquities stolen, countless of its inhabitants killed and many others abandoned the comfort of their homes and migrated in search of a “better life” (servitude) in the west.

• Case 2. On November 3rd , 2020, the TPLF forces unleashed a massive preemptive attack on Ethiopia’s Northern command stationed in Tigray bordering Eritrea which escalated into full blown war and resulted in massive human and material loss. For clarification to those who don’t have any background knowledge, TPLF or Tigray Peoples Liberation Front, was a rebel movement that played an important role in defeating the brutal Derg régime of Ethiopia using a huge support from the EPLF (Eritrean People’s Liberation Front) in 1991. Unfortunately, this mafia group, whose members hailed from the Adwa district of Tigray region hadn’t liberated itself from inferiority complex and pathologic ethnocentricity it suffers which was the leading cause of ethnic bloodshed seen in the country for three decades and its ultimate demise.

In the year 2018, two years before the war erupted the Ethiopian Parliament (EPRDF) convened to discuss the
country’s future and to figure out means to control the ethnic-related killings that were ravaging Ethiopia like a wildfire and threatening the country’s very existence. It was during that time the ethnocentric TPLF leaders who
were (mis)governing the country in every imaginary manner for over 28 years were ousted from power and
replaced by a government lead by PM Abiy Ahmed Ali, a vibrant, broad-minded and inclusive leader.

Shortly after his election by the EPRDF as Prime Minister, Dr. Abiy Ahmed did something noble and admirable that no previous Ethiopian leaders had ever done as far as regional conflicts are concerned. To the astonishment of the TPLF clique and its sponsors and with an overwhelming support and approval by the Ethiopian Parliament the new Ethiopian government reestablished a long overdue diplomatic ties with Eritrea, where both countries signed a comprehensive Peace Agreement which comprised broad areas; including economic cooperation and unconditional implementation of the final and binding Eritrea Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) demarcation ruling which affirmed Badme, the flashpoint of the TPLF-designed war of aggression, was Eritrean.

Such peace initiative between these two governments who had been at each other’s throat for 50 years and the subjects of multiple disastrous wars that consumed many lives received strong appraisal by the majority of the people of both countries, who viewed it as an opportunity to work and live together as neighbors in peace and harmony and thrive.

To the astonishment of the TPLF clique and its sponsors and with overwhelming support and approval by the Parliament the new government reestablished the long overdue diplomatic ties with Eritrea, where both countries signed a comprehensive Peace Agreement which comprised broad areas including economic cooperation and unconditional implementation of the final and binding EEBC demarcation ruling.


Dismayed and angry over the loss of absolute authority and the privilege it enjoyed for almost three decades, the TPLF leadership retreated to Mekele, Tigray’s capital where they congregated for two years and had made a preparation to accomplish two objectives: (1) Their first and immediate goal was to overthrow the legitimate Ethiopian Federal Government militarily and regain power. (2) TPLF clique’s second objective was to fulfill its futile dream of creating ‘Greater Tigray’ by invading Eritrea, something it has been obsessed with since its inception (read Greater Tigray Manifesto). In fulfilling such mission extensive preparation was underway including military recruitment, building up its arms capability which included highly sophisticated ammunitions and missiles and hiring propagandists to disseminate false information across the globe. In the days preceding the full-fledged war the ousted and outlawed TPLF leaders openly bragged about their ‘military might’ and assured their followers a total victory in the war against “foreign forces” in a reference to Ethiopian forces who were defending Tigray. These are all documented facts, one can access on major reliable and independent Media.

At the height of the war, several missiles were fired towards Eritrea targeting Asmara, Eritrea’s capital, and several other heavily-populated Eritrean cities. This was an act of aggression, in clear violation of international law. The aim was to pull Eritrea into an internal Ethiopian crisis and internationalize the conflict. The fact that Eritrea had shown restraint under such provocation, was praised by many.

For the sake of peace and to avoid adding fuel to the fire that was raging and complicate matters, the Eritrean government refrained from taking such action, a noble move that should have been commended and not condemned. Governments that still occupy several sovereign states whom they claim are the major source of global threat (i.e. Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Mali, …) have no moral or legal ground and are in no position to stop Eritrea from taking steps, deemed appropriate to protect its borders.

For the sake of peace and to avoid adding fuel to the fire that was raging and complicate matters further, the Eritrean government refrained from taking such action, a noble move that should have been commended and not condemned.


These two events have one thing in common: they are forms of war of different scale, that occurred at different period of time. The outcomes of war are always unpleasant and painful. Sadly, in any war there will be unintended civilian deaths except in rare cases in which irresponsible governments would intentionally target civilians. There’ll be mass displacement and not to mention the emotional and psychological trauma that will be inflicted, on the survivors and the families of the victims. Where these two cases differ revolve around how they were managed, by the institution established to solve world crisis. To help assess the situation in both cases better one needs to pay close attention to the genesis and the authenticity leading up to the conflict, and whether United Nations Security Council (UNSC) was fair and impartial in addressing them.

On the first case, a sovereign member state was totally destroyed on the basis of perceived threat resulting in the death of thousands of civilians. Heeding to the call by the US and UK governments, many nations participated in this unholy and unjustifiable war of aggression. The sad part is that the world body whose mission was to protect member states from unwarranted acts of aggression on equal footing, did not attempt to stop the carnage even after the report of the falsification of Iraq’s possession of WMD was confirmed. This was a clear case of war of aggression that could have been avoided, a war based on perceived threat. The US government using its power and massive influence it enjoys in the decision making as a member of United Nations Security Council, managed to silence critics on Iraq war and swept the case under the rag.

In the case of Eritrea, another sovereign member state that was the target of multiple missiles; a country whose territory was still occupied against the 2002 EEBC international border ruling, decided to reposition its forces to its sovereign territories and positions that make it border more secure. In this case, not only was Eritrea dealing with a real threat of war; including the firing of lethal rockets that was witnessed by Western diplomats, it was also clearly a pure example of self-defense, that should have had international support not condemnation.

The question is, how did the international community kowtowed by the US manage these two cases? Given the background and events leading up to the conflict and the subsequent humanitarian crisis, does one feel a sense of hypocrisy on how they were handled?

In the case of Iraq where the possession of WMD turned out to be a sham, the international community was too soft and did not demand the withdrawal of US troops and the coalition forces from Iraqi territory. Consequently, thousands of civilians were killed and millions displaced. To this day, American soldiers remain stationed in Iraq under a pretext that leaving the country at this juncture would open a door for the extremists.

With regard to Eritrea, a sovereign state which is within its mandate and legal right to counterattack in self-defense, we are witnessing a barrage of condemnation from the self-righteous West to a point of bluntly accusing Eritrea for a made up Axum massacre and other tales of horror in the Tigray region of Ethiopia; which all turned out to be pure fabrications.

In summary, according to the western governments who control 3/5 of the veto seats at UNSC, the international law enshrined in UN charter in which a member state can defend itself from real threat comes with certain exceptions: is the country a puppet of the West? In other words, what’s the country’s political alliance? Does the need for intervention help advance the geopolitical agenda of the West, in any way?

In the case of Eritrea, where the threat of war was crystal clear and the country was directly attacked and has, according to the international law, every right not only to defend itself, but to pursue the attackers wherever they may be an exception was applied. We are seeing certain powers within the United Nations Security Council condemning Eritrea, for defending itself from a real threat. These governments with muscle went beyond condemnation and portrayed Eritrea as the aggressor by utilizing fake news of massacres and other crimes created and fabricated by some political NGOs, pseudo journalists and a number of mainstream media that chose to echo lies.

The reason Eritrea was consistently attacked by the West in such manner is obvious: the country follows a system of governance which does not align or ‘tip toe’ that of the West or the East for that matter; a system based on self-reliance, something particularly Western governments find unpalatable and against their capitalist values. It’s primarily for this reason Eritrea has been at the receiving end of the attack by the west for decades, including the unwarranted sanctions, tampering with and blocking the implementation of the EEBC ruling and other political pressures. The other reason that must be highlighted as to why Eritrea has been at the receiving end of malicious attack pertains to the TPLF, a mafia group that has inflicted insurmountable pain and suffering to the people of the region since its inception. To the dismay of its sponsors, the “errand boy” TPLF that tried to destabilize the entire region, including Eritrea and Somalia for decades, in the name of “war against terrorism” and enticed violence between Ethiopians on the bases of ethnicity was humiliated and defeated. For the Western governments who are so consumed with protecting their geopolitical interests at any cost, the peace and stability that would come about by removing a criminal group that was the major source of chaos and instability means absolutely nothing.

For the Western governments who are so consumed with protecting their narrow geopolitical interests at any cost, the peace and stability that would come about by removing a criminal group that was the major source of chaos and instability means absolutely nothing.


The decision by the US State Department to impose visa sanctions on Eritrea as the country was celebrating its hard won independence is ill-conceived, unwarranted and unjustifiable; a desperate move meant to somehow resuscitate and revive the evil force that’s long gone. If there’s anyone who committed heinous crimes in Tigray and other regions of Ethiopia, it’s the TPLF and its cronies. Scapegoating Eritrea for crimes committed by others, will not bring about a solution to the problems at hand. Addressing the core issue in an unbiased manner, facilitating for independent investigation to the case and bringing the perpetrators of the crimes to justice in accordance with international law is the right path for achieving world peace.

The aforementioned cases are just a few of many, which illustrate the absurd duplicity with which world crisis have been managed by a world body that was supposed to protect all member states on equal footing. Today, we are witnessing that a country which declares itself “superpower” flexing its muscle, bullying and terrorizing other nations in the name of democracy or based on false and unsubstantiated allegations at will, condoning and defending an ally’s excessive use of force on civilians without feeling a grain of shame while condemning and threatening another for defending itself from real and documented threat. Article 39 of the UN charter which was designed to bring world peace is sadly being used selectively to serve the geopolitical ambition of the few and the “wealthy” nations, at the expense of others. If this is not the worst case of hypocrisy one won’t know what is. And unless and until the world unify and demand for major transformation on how the United Nations manages crisis, the prospect for world peace remains bleak and beyond reach.

Post Reply