Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Zmeselo » 20 Jun 2021, 13:53



Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Ethiopia accuses Tedros Adhanom of soliciting diplomatic, military support for Tigray People's Liberation Front

Seleshi Tessema

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/africa/ethiopi ... at/2046193#

17.11.2020


Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia

World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom has been
fully engaged in soliciting diplomatic and military support
for the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) in many parts of the world, a top official said Monday.

Tedros, who has been serving in his position at the WHO since 2017, was a member of the TPLF’s powerful Executive Committee. He was also Ethiopia’s health minister from 2005 to 2012 and foreign affairs minister from 2012 to 2016.

The official, who was not allowed to publicly discuss the matter, told Anadolu Agency on the condition of anonymity that the Ethiopian government had been well aware of Tedros’s activities since the beginning of the National Defense Force’s law enforcement operation against the TPLF, which is entrenched in the northern Tigray region.
Tedros had been lobbying the UN agencies to exert pressure on the Ethiopian government to unconditionally stop its military action against the TPLF,
he noted.
He was relentlessly demonizing us.
The official added that Tedros had also been soliciting Egyptian military support for the TPLF.
To ally with Egypt, which had been bent on destabilizing Ethiopia for decades and aborting construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), is tantamount to treason,
he said.

According to the official, who attended many high-profile government briefings on the matter, Tedros was also active in eastern Africa.
He repeatedly called top officials of many neighboring nations and pressured them to provide military and diplomatic support to the TPLF,
he noted, adding those countries informed the Ethiopian government.
Those countries, which we cannot name, told us they declined Tedros’s requests, saying the conflict was an internal Ethiopian affair and they stand with us,
he said.

The official said from what they have gathered, Tedros was serving as a
full-time diplomat of the TPLF, breaching the duties of the director-general of the WHO.
We are readying a protest note to the WHO and other relevant bodies,
the official added.​​​​​​​

Ethiopia has launched what it describes as a law enforcement operation in Tigray after forces of the TPLF attacked the northern command of the federal army stationed across the Tigray region, killing soldiers and looting military assets.

The TPLF dominated political life in Ethiopia for more than three decades before current Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, who hails from the Oromo ethnic group, came to power in 2018.

The Oromo is the largest ethnic tribe in Ethiopia, representing around 34.9% of the country’s population of 114.9 million, while the Tigray account for only 7.3%.


____________________



ምን ብታጨስ ነው ግን፥ እንዲህ የሚያደርጋት? :lol:


eden
Member+
Posts: 9268
Joined: 15 Jan 2009, 14:09

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by eden » 20 Jun 2021, 14:11

The war has become so people centered in terms of impact, all of Tigray has started speaking up boldly. The director is one expression of this popular resistance. The Ethiopians are not as bold because of the propaganda that conditioned them to not feel pains inflicted in war zones. That's my view. But the people in war zones experience what goes on first hand and the elites has first hand information.

The director talks about the effect in terms of his own family who live in war zone. The patriarch also gets first hand information and has spoken boldly. Ethiopians will get it as more information flows and they overcome the propaganda hold. The same can be said about Eritrean, including you. You will wake up from the bubble the HGDEF has managed to box you in because the impact in people ca no longer be denied due to its extent and depth.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Zmeselo » 20 Jun 2021, 15:00


"A Southern Light at the end of the Tunnel"



How a Norwegian man triggered Tigray War in Ethiopia

By Admasu Ashango *

http://awasaguardian.com/index.php/2021 ... -ethiopia/

June 20, 2021

In 1884, European colonizers held the Berlin conference to carve up Africa and to “civilize” black people claiming that Africans were savages, inferior and
white man’s burden.
Over a century later, African people know that such racist “civilizing mission” rationale has mostly been replaced with a new pretext: a “humanitarian mission.” The successive events preceding the war in Tigray region of Ethiopia display how individual Western brokers of humanitarian crisis operate and why most Ethiopians hold the infamous Norwegian man Kjetil Tronvoll responsible for inciting the Tigray conflict.

TPLF history in Tigray

The Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) leadership came to power in 1991 after a long guerrilla war by sacrificing tens of thousands of Tigrayan fighters for a “Greater Tigray” dream, and killing over hundred-thousand Tigrayans thru famine after TPLF stole aid money to buy weapons, according to the BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8535189.stm In the past, the West supported the TPLF’s rebel insurrection and turned a blind eye when the rebels held their own people (Tigrayans) hostage, because the CIA and the US State Department vehemently opposed Ethiopia’s 1980s pro-Soviet central government. After overthrowing that central government in 1991, the US continued funding TPLF as it mercilessly ruled Ethiopia thru apartheid, tyranny and endless atrocities for nearly three decades, until it ultimately lost power in 2018.

Since then, the TPLF dictators have plotted to regain power in Ethiopia thru two ways: via a coup utilizing the pre-existing Tigrayan monopoly inside the ENDF military; http://www.ginbot7.org/2014/10/07/tplfs ... our-years/ or, if that scheme fails, revert back to the 1980s tactic of guerrilla warfare and exploit the West’s “humanitarian” intervention to portray itself as a victim. To the surprise of many Tigrayan activists, TPLF’s first option of military coup failed miserably; so we are currently at the second option. And with the core Tigray region being the most famine-prone populated area of Ethiopia, rebellions in Tigray have historically used food as a weapon of war for decades. Therefore, for the foreseeable future, blockading rural enclaves and starving Tigrayans http://awasaguardian.com/index.php/2021 ... fraid-voa/ as hostages for leverage to acquire aid, weapons and other resources will be a blueprint the TPLF insurgents will follow, as long as the international community continues to peddle false portrayals of TPLF as victims.

But this senseless war was not supposed to happen in the first place.

HOW WAS WAR AVOIDED IN 2018?

There were many reasons why Prime Minister Dr Abiy Ahmed won the Nobel Peace Prize. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace ... s-release/ While the TPLF lost its main power at the center of Ethiopia in Addis Ababa due to massive peaceful protests, Dr Abiy’s new government still allowed TPLF to maintain relative power at the regional Tigray capital city of Mekelle in 2018. This approach enabled a rare peaceful transition of power in Ethiopia, making it an African success story. The new Prime Minister Dr Abiy Ahmed followed that accomplishment by legalizing all major rebel organizations (ONLF, OLF and Ginbot 7) to operate peacefully in Ethiopia and then by making a historic peace deal with Eritrea, which won him the Nobel Peace Prize.

That Nobel Prize not only recognized the accomplishments already achieved by Dr Abiy’s administration by the end of 2019; it also hoped to influence future successes, a similar tactic used by the Nobel Prize selection Committee that prematurely awarded US President Barack Obama (before he launched wars in Syria & Libya. https://www.cato.org/commentary/revoke- ... eace-prize) Fortunately, Dr Abiy chose a different path than Obama by promoting peace, not only inside Ethiopia, but also in South Sudan, Somalia and regionally. While some corrupt TPLF billionaires (who had crooked reputation even among Tigrayans) were previously charged; after Dr Abiy won the Nobel prize, he took a more conciliatory approach by sending elders to mediate with TPLF, even making several trips to Tigray himself to buildup trust and extend an olive branch.


(Image: Abiy in Tigray pre-War)

All these mediatory moves and appeasing acts by Abiy occurred, while dodging assassination attempts and enduring TPLF-financed destabilizations nationwide. Some of his supporters even said Abiy deserves another award, the Ghandi Peace Prize, for his restraint and pacific efforts. But the rest of Ethiopians accused Abiy of unfairness and for displaying extra patience for Tigray, because he sent troops to crackdown against Wolayta separatist dissidents.

All the peacemaking acts in Tigray by Abiy robbed the war that the TPLF desperately wanted…,at least temporarily.

BEHIND THE SCENES

The power-hungry millionaires inside TPLF https://tesfanews.net/crony-capitalism- ... racle/?amp knew they needed a major disorder to overthrow Abiy and regain their hegemony. The problem in 2018 was the regular Tigrayan man & woman did not lose anything under Abiy, because the average Tigrayan did not care about TPLF’s multi-billion dollar empire. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/c ... ontext=jil Therefore, the TPLF leadership had to make-up grievances out of thin air and build a political rationale of victimhood to justify this senseless conflict.

After brutally oppressing 100 Million Ethiopians for 28 years and lacking sympathy from most independent observers in the international community, the TPLF pressed a reset [deleted] in 2019 using its Western networks (the Alex de Waals of Europe and Herman Cohens of US et al) and betted on the inherent racism or usual ignorance of the new-breed of young Westerners assigned to Africa (correspondents, diplomats, writers ..) to portray yet another African crisis that is a white man’s burden. Most of all, TPLF needed Western figures to rubber-stamp its message between 2019-2020. This is where Norwegian Professor Kjetil Tronvoll came into the picture as the most valuable actor to damage the transition in Ethiopia. He was already a well-known figure in Ethiopia, particularly inside central Tigray. And post-2018, Professor Tronvoll became a regular feature on TPLF media outlets like Dimtsi Weyane and TMMA’s Tigray TV, often criticizing shortcomings of the new Prime Minister Abiy’s reforms, virtually on a daily basis, even while Abiy won the Nobel Peace Prize.


(Image: Prof. Tronvoll in TPLF media Dimtsi Woyane (DW)

Since then, Prof. Tronvoll essentially became the TPLF ambassador to the outside world, while simultaneously amplifying & normalizing the most fringe voices of Tigrayan society by utilizing his White Privilege to use various publications to promote Tigray “secession,” “independence,” or “statehoodhttps://addisstandard.com/in-depth-[deleted] ... statehood/ radical narratives and the “collapse” of Ethiopia. After decades of tyranny and looting billions of dollars https://www.ginbot7.org/effort-and-the- ... ss-empire/ from Ethiopians, the TPLF dictators desperately needed a White proxy and Mr Tronvoll knew he will be effective.

One of the dangerous residues of the European colonial legacy is that many Africans continue to seek confirmation from White experts, white institutions, officials or other White figures. And both sides exploit this dynamic and it is quite noticeable through out every Ethiopian transaction with the outside world. Whether it is in how Ethiopians interact with Western institutions or even how Ethiopians react to White figures on Social Media platforms like Twitter, this reality of White privilege and superiority is manifested everyday. And Africans often enable it, unwittingly. Yet this vicious cycle is not just a two-wheeled machine, but Western policy-makers add a third component to it by consuming only the analysis and proposals of these White brokers of African crisis.

Over the years, individual Western experts, lobbyists and analysts have monetized and taken advantage of this reality to a perfection. While the full extent of his alleged business dealings in TPLF-era Ethiopia are unknown, Professor Kjetil appears to have become the unofficial spokesman of TPLF hardliners. (Norwegian companies like Yara, have allegedly won multi-million dollar business contracts after praising former TPLF dictator Meles Zenawi) It wasn’t long after TPLF lost power in Addis Ababa, that Mr Tronvoll began beating the drums of war and heralding fringe factions inside TPLF who wanted “secession” as the legitimate representation of the views of Tigray people. When these former TPLF extremists established parties like TIP who wanted to implement the original secessionist TPLF manifesto, Mr Tronvoll was quick to advertise them as legitimate “opposition” party in Tigray despite having no ideological difference with the TPLF rulers (like Ezema or other real opposition forces do.) In various articles he published on major Ethiopian and international media outlets, Mr Tronvoll parroted the radical views of TPLF ideologues and ignored even longstanding opposition movements inside Tigray like ARENA, in favor of new and fringe pro-TPLF movements, which helped push TPLF moderates more to the extreme. For example, at the end of 2019, even Tigray president Debretsion expressed a more moderate stance on Abiy’s reforms compared to extreme commentaries broadcasted & shared on Tigrayan websites, traditional and social media outlets quoting Professor Kjetil Tronvoll.

When many Ethiopians accused him of supporting and intellectualizing TPLF militancy, Mr Tronvoll defended himself claiming to stand for dissidents. But in reality, he not only galvanized TPLF extremists in Tigray to weaken TPLF moderates, but he also repeatedly downplayed the persecuted opposition dissidents inside Welkait & Raya parts of Tigray, despite self-proclaiming that he stands for autonomy and dissidents.

Pre-war, Mr Tronvoll became the most influential TPLF surrogate using at least two key strategies:

1. Depicting Prosperity Party (PP) as anti-multinational-federalism, and thus portraying TPLF as the only strong defender of ethnic autonomy.
2. Depicting TPLF as a pro-election democratic organization resisting an authoritarian central government in Addis Ababa, that will indefinitely postpone elections

Both tasks were a tall order, especially since TPLF itself is famous for ethnic cleansings in Welkait (“Western Tigray”) and for rigging elections with its North Korean type 99% poll victories year after year. In one interview Prof Tronvoll had with an independent Oromo media, right after he personally witnessed TPLF’s sham election as “international observer,” he dodged questions about the latest rigging, https://yeroo.org/2020/10/16/yeroo-inte ... -ethiopia/ in order to not admit that yet another rigged 99% election victory for TPLF just took place. When it comes to the topic of autonomy, the main nuisance for TPLF was that (despite pressure from major opposition groups like EZEMA and Balderas) Abiy refused to reform the ethnic-federalism system created by TPLF and he kept the status quo of autonomy for ethnic enclaves. Even today, after TPLF was removed, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s political position remains much closer to TPLF than any other party. For example, the current transitional government of Tigray Prosperity Party (PP) established by Abiy supports multinational federalism, just like the former TPLF rulers did. The current Tigray-PP also opposes Eritrean annexation of Badme; just like TPLF. Similarly, the current Tigray-PP opposes Amhara claims on Welkait (Western Tigray) and Afar claims on other territories in Tigray. Therefore, Tigray-PP and TPLF are virtually the exact same parties by policy and ideology; minus the multi-billion dollar conglomerate the TPLF built.

In hindsight, by starting a war it can not win, the TPLF essentially forced Abiy (who was pro status quo in Tigray) to be more dependent on the Amhara & Afar forces that he can not control but desperately needed for law enforcement. Accordingly, during its efforts to mobilize support pre-War, the TPLF could not truthfully portray Abiy’s administration as anti-autonomy, so it did the next best thing: simply make it up… and do so repeatedly until the lies became truth.

For this to happen, Professor Kjetil was the most valuable TPLF surrogate in this endeavor; not only because he was the most actively involved White “expert” in Ethiopian politics and often quoted by Western media; but he also had significant personal connections with famous nativist and separatist ethnic-nationalist activists through out the country, including in our SNNP region. (of-course he claimed to do this for “research,” though his “research” appears to conveniently skip the other half of the Ethiopian population who oppose ethnic-federalism) In many cases, Mr Tronvoll used his easy access to Western media to overtly push the narrative that only such ethnic extremists who advocate for ethnic separatism and nativism in Ethiopia are the legitimate expression of Ethiopian society. This false narrative is why many Western media today put emphasis on the incarceration of radical nativists like Jawar Mohammed to discredit the Ethiopian election; while in reality, moderates of both sides of the aisle [ethnic-federalists (PP) and Ethiopianists (Ezema)] are fairly represented in the upcoming democratic election. By the end of 2019, several popular ethno-nationalists (from the Oromo, Sidama, Gumuz, Wolayta et al regions) that Mr Tronvoll closely associated with, started buying into the idea of TPLF as the leader of a so-called federalist coalition. Some of these extreme nativists even made trips to Mekelle for “federalist” conferences or meetings.

While these confrontational developments increased tensions between TPLF and the central government, it was not enough to trigger the war alone. Particularly, (though most Tigrayan people naturally had deep identity-based allegiance to the TPLF) a significant portion of the Tigrayan population did not buy into TPLF’s big lie that Abiy was a threat to Tigrayan autonomy. In contrast, the second strategy of declaring unilateral elections inside Tigray, however, became very instrumental in emotionally rallying and involving millions of average Tigrayans personally in the post-2018 TPLF defiance against the rule of law. As expected, both before and after this catastrophic decision by TPLF, Mr Tronvoll became the most influential white voice legitimizing such mutiny and intellectualizing Tigrayan grievances to the international community. On the ground, he appeared on several Tigrayan media outlets openly portraying Abiy as a “dangerous” man and rendering the unilateral TPLF actions as justified. Several notable Ethiopian peace activists and scholars like Prof Yohanes Gedamu, Teshome Borago, Ephrem Madebo and even his own research colleague Biruk Terrefe criticized Mr Tronvoll’s actions, as he became the only Western actor legitimizing the unauthorized election in Tigray. Other Ethiopians urged Mr Tronvoll (in vain) to become an instrument for good by using his deep connections with TPLF leaders like Getachew Reda, Abay Tsehaye as well as TPLF ideologues like Mekelle University President Kindeya G-Hiwot, to de-escalate tensions. He refused. During his unauthorized trip to Tigray, he met Prof Meresa Tsehaye, another key TPLF ideologue and an extremist who labelled Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed “illegitimate” and “dictator.” As a leading proponent of the unilateral illegal election, Prof Tsehaye was appointed as chairman of the unauthorized Tigray election board, which Prof Tronvoll praised and met in September 2020. In a controversial tweet, Tronvoll then posted a selfie with Prof Tsehaye in Mekelle, declaring himself as a one-man institution and
the only accredited international election observer
in Tigray.

In response, many TPLF leaders sought to use Mr Tronvoll to bring credibility to their illegal election and normalize their mutiny.

After the above TPLF strategies took on a life of their own, the prospects for war became a matter of when, not if. By mid 2020, TPLF was already preparing for war and digging trenches, several months before conflict actually began. Once Tigray essentially became an independent government outside the control of the Ethiopian government, all the federal bases and ENDF machinery (representing more than half of the entire nation’s defense) stationed inside Tigray were held hostage. After TPLF opened fire on Nov 4, the only question remaining was if Prime Minister Abiy had any more patience left, to the level of suicidal and if he cares more about his Nobel Peace stamped personal reputation rather than the whole country’s survival. He chose the latter.

Of course, as conflict was beginning, Mr Tronvoll continued emboldening the TPLF leaders, while telling international media how brave and powerful TPLF insurrectionists are. Since he was the main “analyst” referred by Western media, he appeared on several news agencies like German’s Deutsche Welle (DW): saying
Tigrayans are fighters….there will never be peace in northern Ethiopia,
he added.

In November, Mr Tronvoll also told AP that TPLF can
fight its way to the capital,
because Tigray fighters
outnumber the federal army by at least two or three multiples,
suggesting that nearly half million Tigrayans are combatants.

Yet, when TPLF suddenly lost Mekelle and the War, the narrative quickly changed and every single TPLF combatant now became an innocent civilian, thus demanding Western “humanitarian intervention” to stop the genocidal Abiy Ahmed, according to Mr Tronvoll.

Even during the war, he continued to portray the TPLF as a victim who used to practice a free democracy. Mr Tronvoll labeled Abiy a “dictator” while using descriptions like the
elected regional government of TPLF
pursuing a
resistance war,
despite the fact TPLF admitted waging
pre-emptive strike
to trigger the war.

(Many of those murdered in ENDF camps in Tigray were soldiers from SNNP region because TPLF assigned more southerners at the Eritrean border fearing Oromo & Amhara defections) While the victims were non-Tigrayans in the army who were ethnic profiled by Tigrayan generals in ENDF, Mr Tronvoll disseminated alternative facts and narratives. For example, in January, he labeled TPLF insurrection as “resistance struggle” and as
a war of independence from an Ethiopia they no longer can trust or live in peace with,
perpetuating the seeds of hate he planted using his access to mass media.

Whenever TPLF forces assassinate or ambush government forces, Mr Tronvoll was one of the first public figures to advertise the events as a successful show of force that obligates Addis Ababa to negotiate with terrorists. This displayed, how close he remained with insurgent military personal and TPLF leaders. And whenever the TPLF lost a battle, he was among the first to disseminate and depict the events as a “massacre” of Tigrayan civilians, which feeds more into the false narrative of “Tigray genocide.” The fact that most TPLF fighters, even some elite forces, have been in civilian clothing has facilitated such propaganda to this day and it is accepted as fact by Western media without any scrutiny. Therefore, instead of pressuring the disarmament of TPLF insurgents, destructive Western media narratives continue to embolden TPLF to use more civilian clothed fighters and perpetuate the human right crisis.

Unfortunately, more will die in the coming weeks and this is just the way promoters of African crisis like Prof. Tronvoll anticipated. In one of his most racist comments, Mr Tronvoll said
Spring is the traditional Ethiopian warring season,
as if killing is our preferred ritual: reminiscent of how White colonizers described black Africa as savage people who need civilizing.

In recent weeks, Prof Tronvoll spends most of his time attacking the Nobel Peace Prize committee for rewarding Abiy Ahmed while insulting the African Union (AU) for alleged “incompetence” and criticizing UN Security Council officials like Sec-General Antonio Guterres for not overthrowing the Ethiopian government. A White “expert” who preyed on black people to incite a catastrophic war inside the only black country that defeated European colonialists, now slandering the African Union and pushing UN sanctions on the country, while demanding the revocation of a Nobel Prize that is rarely given to a black African. The brutal irony can not be lost for the history books.

The sad reality is there is no turning back, for those who bought the big lie and are now at the battlefield. Thousands have already died and the TPLF will likely hold more Tigrayans hostage, to get access to dwindling resources. This is expected because its 1980s reputation shows that TPLF uses hunger of its hostages as a strategy, a weapon of war. And many more will die in the coming months, because Western white powers will waste their energy on patronizing Ethiopia with punitive actions which embolden rebels and more outlaw behavior that they wouldn’t tolerate if it happened in their own home countries. By the time enough responsible Western governments finally join Ethiopia in demanding the disarmament and condemnation of TPLF insurgents, it will be too late for the Tigrayan men and women who die raising arms as well as for the other Ethiopians who will die defending the rule of law in this conflict that should have never happened.

Many years from now, when Ethiopians and other Africans look back in history on how one Norwegian man (among several other Europeans who dumped fuel in the fire) played the biggest role in triggering this Tigray conflict that will ultimately incur a death-toll of hundreds of thousands of souls, many of us will wonder, what was the role of Norwegian government behind Prof. Kjetil Tronvoll. If the multimillion dollar funding that Prof Tronvoll’s group allegedly received from Norway’s foreign ministry https://www.newsinenglish.no/2016/10/19 ... ting-fees/ is accurate, more questions should arise about the indirect destabilization roles of the Norway foreign affairs desk that was once already accused of legitimizing terror groups like LTTE, which prolonging the Sri Lankan civil war in the name of endless ceasefire agreements.

But what happened in Tigray is unique since, as the aforementioned two-part rationale for the conflict depicts, Mr Tronvoll’s direct role pre-war (inside Tigray and among international media) was the most influential in rehabilitating TPLF’s corrupt & ruthless reputation, promoting extremist factions inside Tigray as well as legitimizing and beating the drums of war.

Mr Tronvoll will not be alone, and as often is the case, the white knights of “international justice” and “humanitarian intervention” often follow these promoters of African crisis, in order to criminalize African leaders and destabilize African states. Such criminalization of black Africans in power is one of the methods the West uses to advance their geopolitical interests, to perpetuate a cycle of wars, legitimize coups and destroy once budding democracies. In contrast, It is no coincidence that Western leaders who caused mass atrocities of millions of civilians in places like Iraq and Libya never face justice, because Western capitals know
peaceful transition of power
is valuable to sustain their stable democracies.

This can not be overstated: every-time the West delegitimizes democratic African governments and legitimizes insurrections, they are robbing our continent of the “peaceful transition of power” that they hold so dear in their own Western capitals. Opposing such Western policies is not only about protecting African sovereignty, it is also a matter of defending human rights and breaking the cycle of wars in Africa.

It is up-to us Africans, whether or not we learn a lesson from this period in history to change our views, how we interact and enable the White promoters & brokers of endless African crisis. They are a residue of the European colonial legacy and tackling them requires the same change in mindset that our ancestors had in the 1960s liberation movements, across the continent. Vital in this process is documenting who the main White players are, and what they do to trigger wars that push our black children to slaughter each other; while sitting in the comfort of their peaceful homes in the West.

* Admasu Ashango is a human rights & peace activists and former chair of the WCHR. To submit analysis and opinion articles for publication, contact AG at [email protected]


___________________


Numbers of #EthioElection2021.
☞ 46 political parties,
☞ 9,505 candidates,
☞ 637 constituencies,
☞ 48,000 polling stations,
☞ 38m+ voters,
☞ 207k ballot boxes,
☞ 1,400+ certified reporters,
☞ 46k+ observers,
☞ 100+ int'l observers, and etc..
(Source: @NEBEthiopia)




Last edited by Zmeselo on 20 Jun 2021, 18:12, edited 3 times in total.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Zmeselo » 20 Jun 2021, 16:10





ዛሬ ምሽት ሁሉንም የፖለቲካ ፓርቲዎች በማሰባሰብ የመልካም ምኞት መግለጫ ሥነ ሥርዓት ያዘጋጀውን "ማይንድ ኢትዮጵያ" እናመሰግናለን፡፡ በእርግጥም ኢትዮጵያ ታሸንፋለች!




Thank you to MIND Ethiopia, for the initiative to bring all political parties together this evening in a well- wishing ceremony. Indeed, Ethiopia will prevail!




መልክም እድል ለሁሉም:: Good Luck to all!
Abiy Ahmed Ali: @AbiyAhmedAli


____________________________



Noble Amhara
Senior Member
Posts: 11713
Joined: 02 Feb 2020, 13:00
Location: Abysinnia Highlands

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Noble Amhara » 20 Jun 2021, 16:19


Zmeselo wrote:
20 Jun 2021, 16:10


ዛሬ ምሽት ሁሉንም የፖለቲካ ፓርቲዎች በማሰባሰብ የመልካም ምኞት መግለጫ ሥነ ሥርዓት ያዘጋጀውን "ማይንድ ኢትዮጵያ" እናመሰግናለን፡፡ በእርግጥም ኢትዮጵያ ታሸንፋለች!

Aba
Member
Posts: 4018
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 17:52

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Aba » 20 Jun 2021, 17:14

Ethiopia’s historic election overshadowed by a cascade of crises and conflict

By Max Bearak. June 20, 2021 at 4:00 a.m. EDT

Ethiopia is set to hold a twice-delayed national election on Monday in what the government has heralded as a long-awaited emergence into multiparty democracy. But a cascade of major crises in Africa’s second-most populous country has thrown the vote into disarray, leaving millions unable to vote.

Foremost among them is a disastrous seven-month-old civil war in the northern region of Tigray, where a powerful regional political party is waging a guerilla-style conflict against Ethiopia’s military, which in turn has aligned with forces from neighboring Eritrea and Ethiopia’s Amhara region. All sides have been accused of war crimes, and humanitarian groups say hundreds of thousands in Tigray are experiencing famine conditions.

The election itself has been weakened by widespread insecurity, logistical issues and political disputes. Tigray will not take part in the vote at all, and about a fifth of polling stations in the rest of the country will not open on Monday because of security concerns or improperly printed ballots, according to the country’s election commission. The closed polling stations tend to be in areas where opposition parties claim support. Those closures as well as the jailing of numerous prominent government critics have led some of the country’s biggest opposition parties to boycott the election.

Here’s what you need to know.

What’s at stake in the election?

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed came to power in 2018 on a wave of discontent against what many Ethiopians perceived as a system of ethnic favoritism entrenched by the authoritarian, Tigrayan-led regime that had ruled the country for decades. Abiy’s initial moves toward opening up political and media freedoms were widely lauded, and his peace overtures to Eritrea, which formally ended a long and brutal war, earned him a Nobel Peace Prize.

While Abiy is widely expected to be reelected, his standing both within and outside Ethiopia has been greatly diminished since the war in Tigray began. The United States, once a close ally, has sanctioned top government officials for their alleged roles in serious human rights violations in Tigray, suspended all security assistance, and said it was “gravely concerned” about the election environment given multiple crises that “threaten the country’s unity and territorial integrity.” The European Union withdrew its election observers after failing to agree with the government on the mission’s ability to move and communicate independently.

“The prime minister need not be a darling of the west, east, south or north,” Abiy’s spokeswoman, Billene Seyoum, told reporters this past week. “It is sufficient that he stands for the people of Ethiopia and the development of the nation. And on June 21, the people of Ethiopia will decide.”

Are the elections expected to be fair?

The continued detention of some of Ethiopia’s most popular opposition leaders, particularly in Oromia, the country’s biggest and most populous region, has eliminated Abiy’s main challengers from the vote. The government claims jailed opposition leaders are accused of terrorism aimed at destabilizing the country.

The disjointedness of the polls also raises questions of disenfranchisement. Two entire regions, Harari and Somali, will vote in September instead of Monday because of logistical issues. Abiy’s party may win a majority in parliament before those regions get a chance to vote.

“The fact that this election is being held during the rainy season only makes it more problematic,” said Abel Abate Demissie, an Ethiopia analyst at Chatham House. Much of the country lacks adequate transportation infrastructure, which makes getting to polling stations and transporting ballots tricky on muddy roads. He also questioned the government’s ability to secure polling stations as well as safely transport ballot boxes when the military, which has that task, is embroiled in a fierce war in Tigray.

What is the state of the conflict in Tigray?

Fighting is ongoing, and aid agencies report having unfettered access only to a handful of cities where the government has reestablished control. Trips beyond those cities have resulted in numerous instances of aid workers being killed or assaulted, vehicles and their loads being confiscated, and an inability to reach those trapped behind rapidly shifting battle lines.

As of this past week, the United Nations estimates that more than 350,000 people in hard-to-reach parts of Tigray are already in famine, and aid officials and Western government representatives say those numbers will multiply without an abatement of fighting.

In the early stages of the conflict, government-aligned forces took control over western Tigray — an area that neighboring Amharas claim was violently annexed by Tigrayans under the previous regime. Widespread reports of Tigrayans being forced from the region prompted U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to warn that an “ethnic cleansing” was underway. More than 60,000 people fled into neighboring Sudan, mostly from western Tigray, and a further 1.7 million have been rendered homeless in the region at large.

Investigations by human rights organizations, journalists and Ethiopia’s own human rights commission have described dozens of ethnically driven attacks against civilians, including door-to-door executions and the systematic rape of Tigrayans by Eritrean troops. While testimonies indicate one particularly gruesome massacre in November was carried out by Tigrayan forces, who killed more than 600 mostly Amhara people, subsequent months were marked mainly by allegations of atrocities committed against Tigrayans.

Has Ethiopia’s government owned up to its role — and Eritrea’s — in the crisis?

Ethiopia’s government has steadfastly asserted that all blame for the fighting and ensuing suffering of people in Tigray lays at the feet of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, which the government accuses of attacking a military command post last November and sparking the war.

For months, the government maintained that Eritrean troops were not present in Tigray, fighting alongside Ethiopian forces, despite mounting witness and satellite evidence of their movements. Only in April did the government acknowledge the presence of Eritreans and that they may be responsible for the killing of civilians.

If verified, many of the atrocities allegedly committed by both Ethiopian and Eritrean forces would be considered war crimes under international law, including the use of rape and starvation as weapons of war. The Ethiopian government, however, has heavily restricted access for media and rights groups, making verification difficult.

The Ethiopian and Eritrean governments have rejected the findings of groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International as fabricated, and this past week called on the African Union to “immediately cease” its own independent investigation.

“It is extremely regrettable to see that some within the international community have embarked on a mission to undermine the unity, territorial integrity and the cohesion of the Ethiopian state, under the guise of humanitarian concern,” Ethiopian Foreign Minister Demeke Mekonnen said in a statement.

Nevertheless, three Ethiopian soldiers were convicted in May of rape and one of killing a civilian. Twenty-eight more soldiers are on trial for allegedly killing civilians and 25 for acts of sexual violence and rape, according to a statement from the attorney general’s office.

What does all this mean for Ethiopia’s political and economic future?

While Abiy hopes this election will cement his mandate, analysts said there is reason to worry that the election will further destabilize Ethiopia.

The war in Tigray shows no signs of ending and is likely to result in Ethiopia’s tenuous occupation of a region whose population feels besieged, and whose ground is strewn with rubble and unexploded ordnance. Despite government pledges that Eritrean troops would withdraw from Tigray, they have not done so.

Increasing levels of conflict around the country have already triggered a rollback of Abiy’s initial reforms — a trend that will likely be exacerbated by Ethiopia’s increasing alienation from the international community.

And the election itself may be the cause of further violence. Because of opposition boycotts, many newly elected legislators may be seen as illegitimate by their constituents, deepening existing tensions.

“There is a real risk of election-related violence, especially in Addis and Amhara regions, which would push the country further into uncharted waters,” said Abel. “It is very difficult to see the government restoring its legitimacy through these elections alone, both in the eyes of many of its citizens and its international partners.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washin ... utType=amp

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 33606
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Zmeselo » 20 Jun 2021, 17:49



Egypt mobilizes Arab support in Nile dam dispute with Ethiopia

The foreign ministers of the Arab League called on the UN Security Council to urgently convene and discuss the dispute over Ethiopia’s controversial dam on the Nile River.


A worker goes down a construction ladder at the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), near Guba in Ethiopia, on December 26, 2019. EDUARDO SOTERAS/AFP via Getty Images

Ayah Aman @ayahaman

https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... e-ethiopia

June 19, 2021

CAIRO — A few days before Ethiopia starts the second-round filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, scheduled for July 1, Egypt has once again appealed to the UN Security Council. https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsConten ... l-on-.aspx Egypt's plea has wide Arab support after various initiatives and mediation efforts have failed to resolve the dispute.

Speaking at a press conference on the sidelines of an Arab League meeting in Doha June 15, Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit https://www.masrawy.com/news/news_publi ... -%D8%A7%D9 said,
The Arab ministerial council called on the UN Security Council to convene an urgent meeting to discuss the necessary actions to be taken in response to the Ethiopian government’s measures that affect Egypt’s and Sudan’s water security and rights.
He added,
Several decisions were issued at the ministerial meeting. They all affirm a strong Arab support to Egypt and Sudan and stress that their water security is integral to Arab national security.
On June 11, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry addressed a letter to the UN Security Council president https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsConten ... l-on-.aspx expressing Egypt’s objection to Ethiopia’s plan to fill the GERD reservoir during the flood season, its efforts to impose a fait accompli on the two downstream countries and its unilateral moves that violate international law. According to a statement by the Foreign Ministry spokesman, the letter claimed that Ethiopia’s positions over the past months have undermined all efforts https://www.facebook.com/MFAEgypt/posts/111083614534827 to bring about a fair, balanced and binding solution to the dispute.

Other countries also denounced before the UN the Ethiopian government’s policies in the Tigray region https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1090152 as violations of human rights and international law, the ongoing border crisis https://www.arabnews.com/node/1826761/middle-east between Ethiopia and Sudan and the dispute between the two countries over the area of al-Fashqa.

In a June 15 statement, Ethiopia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs complained that such actions are not helpful and will only cause ill feelings between the three countries. It added that the efforts to
internationalize and politicize the GERD dossier https://www.facebook.com/MFAEthiopia/po ... 2428230962 will not ensure a sustainable regional cooperation in the Nile River management,
adding,
It is an existential matter for Ethiopia to exploit the Nile waters, and the Nile does not belong to Egypt and Sudan exclusively.
Sudan also intends to submit to the UN Security Council a letter asking it to examine Ethiopia's practices regarding the second filling of the GERD reservoir on July 1. Sudan’s Minister of Irrigation and Water Resources Yasser Abbas said in a June 14 press conference,
The information available to Khartoum shows that Ethiopia will carry on with the second filling, which would pose a threat
to Sudan's water security.
Abbas added that Sudan is not against reaching a partial agreement https://english.alarabiya.net/News/midd ... ersial-dam on the second filling with Ethiopia. He said,
We are open to the signing of a temporary and partial agreement on the second filling, but the agreement has to involve certain conditions, most notably signing off on everything that has already been agreed on in negotiations. … But Addis Ababa continues to impose insuperable conditions to avoid reaching an agreement.
An Egyptian official told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity that Egypt and Sudan
will continue to coordinate on all technical and diplomatic levels against Ethiopia’s unilateral position.
Commenting on Sudan’s consent to a partial agreement on the dam’s filling, the source said,
Until last week, international and regional mediators suggested initiatives and solutions — which Khartoum and Cairo agreed on — based on mechanisms that would ensure reaching a comprehensive agreement on the GERD filling and management. Yet Ethiopia rejected such proposals, which Egypt articulated in its letter to the UN Security Council.
Egypt’s Al-Azhar https://www.facebook.com/OfficialAzharE ... 3920400462 has also demanded that the international, African, Muslim and Arab communities take responsibility by supporting the Egyptian and Sudanese position against
claims of ownership of the [Nile] river and arbitrary actions that would harm the two peoples,
Al-Azhar Grand Imam Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb stated on June 15.

He went on,
All faiths agree that resources such as rivers are public property and that no single country shall monopolize these resources.
Tayeb warned,
It is prohibited under Sharia to disregard the rights of others. If that happens, there would be dire consequences for world peace.
Salah Halima, deputy chairman of the Egyptian Council for African Affairs, told Al-Monitor that Egypt's appeal to the UN via the Arab League is
different from the previous one when Egypt submitted its first complaint https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... spute.html to the Security Council last year. This time, approaching the Security Council attests that the damage that Ethiopia is causing to Egypt and Sudan amounts to a threat to regional peace and security, particularly in the Red Sea and East Africa.
He said,
Egypt turned to the Security Council under Chapter VII and Article 51 [of the UN charter], which grant states the right to defend themselves when their interests are in peril. Taking unilateral actions and imposing a fait accompli by cutting the flow of water amounts to clear aggression against Egypt and Sudan and a sort of declaration of war.
Halima said of accusations that the Arab League’s move indicates an Arab bloc against Africa,
These claims are mere attempts to cause ill feelings between Arabs and Africans. There are 11 African member states of the Arab League. … Also, there is wide-scale economic rapprochement between Arab countries and Ethiopia, especially some Gulf countries, https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... dam-crisis which invest billions of dollars in the development of Ethiopia.
He added,
It would have been better to warn Ethiopia that it is risking the Arab investments with its intransigence, and that it is better to pursue cooperative policies in the management of the Nile River.
As July 1 approaches, hopeful eyes are watching the international community for efforts to avoid a clash between the three countries. Meanwhile, unofficial reports are circulating that technical problems https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=238945261330309 and flaws in the GERD’s construction will prevent Ethiopia from storing the planned 13.5 billion cubic meters of water in the dam’s reservoir.


___________________


Cairo, Khartoum take Nile dam issue to UN Security Council

Egypt and Sudan mobilize Arab support in anticipation of reinternationalizing the GERD issue at the UN Security Council.


A worker cleans at a resort on the shore of Lake Tana, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Nov. 11, 2020. Lake Tana, a UNESCO biosphere reserve, is the origin of the Blue Nile River that feeds the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam.Eduardo Soteras/AFP via Getty Images

Muhammed Magdy @DMagdy92

https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... ty-council

June 19, 2021

CAIRO — The Arab foreign ministers held an extraordinary meeting June 15 and called on the United Nations Security Council to convene an urgent meeting to discuss the dispute over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), while expressing concern about the stalled negotiations currently sponsored by the African Union (AU).

Egyptian and Sudanese diplomats and experts told Al-Monitor that this was the first time that Arabs took a stand to pressure Ethiopia in the GERD issue, in anticipation of internationalizing it once again at the Security Council.

Prior to the Arab foreign ministers’ meeting, Cairo https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... dam-crisis and Khartoum had addressed letters to the Security Council to explain the developments in the GERD file, and to object to Ethiopia’s intentions to move forward with the second filling of the dam’s reservoir without reaching an agreement on the GERD’s filling and operation with the two downstream countries.

The meeting held in the Qatari capital, Doha, in the presence of 17 Arab foreign ministers, discussed the GERD issue after negotiations with Ethiopia reached a dead end in the last round of talks https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... am-dispute held in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, on April 4-5.

Secretary-General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit announced during a press conference after the meeting,
Arab countries strongly support the downstream countries [Egypt and Sudan].
However, the Ethiopian Foreign Ministry objected https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... e-nile-dam to the Arab League statement, and said in a statement, https://www.alaraby.co.uk/politics/%D8% ... 8%A7%D8%A1
The Arab League has already squandered its opportunity to play a constructive role as a result of its blatant support for the false allegations of Egypt and Sudan regarding the GERD.
In March 2020, the Arab League adopted a draft resolution https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/82 ... ts-to-Nile submitted by Cairo, to reject any unilateral measures by which Ethiopia proceeds in the GERD. But this time the Arab statement reflected the unity of Arab positions, according to Maged Abdel Fattah, head of the Arab League mission to the UN.
The position of Arab countries has shifted; Sudan is lined up with Egypt, and Djibouti and Somalia did not have any reservations regarding the statement, unlike the previous session in June 2020, http://mogadishucenter.com/2020/03/%D8% ... %B1%D8%A8/
he told Al-Monitor.

Abdel Fattah noted that the Arab group which formed in March 2020 to follow up on the issue — which includes Tunisia (the Arab member of the Security Council), Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Morocco as well as the General Secretariat of the Arab League — will begin to meet with members of the Security Council, namely the permanent members, to inform them of the Egyptian and Sudanese position on the GERD issue.

He added that resorting to the Security Council at this time aims to take advantage of the change that occurred within the world, with South Africa, Germany and Belgium no longer being members. These countries, he said, did not support the Egyptian position. They were replaced by Ireland, Norway and Kenya, which have more ties with the Arabs.

However, certain challenges await Cairo if the GERD issue is internationalized again at the Security Council since the developing countries should not include water and climate development issues in the Security Council’s discussions, while the AU is technically still in charge of the negotiations, Abdel Fattah explained.
We will now have to wait and see if Cairo will cooperate with Khartoum to present a new draft resolution, or if it will adopt its previous decision submitted to the Security Council in 2020,
he noted.

Egypt and Sudan have been engaged in tough negotiations with Ethiopia over the GERD for a decade now to reach an agreement on operating and filling the dam, which Egypt considers an existential threat.

Former Egyptian Assistant Foreign Minister Mohammed Morsi told Al-Monitor that no such decision has been taken in the past at the Arab level when it comes to the GERD issue, in reference to the latest Arab League statement.

However, he noted that the impact of the statement will depend on whether or not the Arab countries, especially the Gulf states, will pressure the members of the Security Council to make sure it will convene, then come up with a resolution that meets the minimum demands of Egypt and Sudan.
Most importantly, Gulf countries https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... dam-crisis need to use their economic influence on Ethiopia to urge it to be more flexible in the GERD issue,
Morsi added.

During a press conference after the Doha meeting, Qatari Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman said,
The Arab League may also take gradual measures to support Egypt and Sudan https://aawsat.com/home/article/3029146 ... 8%B6%D8%A9 in the dispute over the dam.
The next day, on June 16, the Gulf Cooperation Council countries voiced their rejection https://www.mubasher.info/news/3820676/ ... %A7%D9%86/ of any Ethiopian measures that affect Egypt’s and Sudan's water rights.

Rakha Ahmed Hassan, a member of the Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs, told Al-Monitor that the Arab reactions come as part of diplomatic pressure https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... dam-crisis through which Egypt and Sudan seek to push Ethiopia to negotiate seriously.
Such actions greatly disturb Ethiopia and put it under pressure, because they serve the interests of Egypt and Sudan,
he said.
It seems that there is an international and regional tendency to give another chance to negotiations and the mediators of the AU and the United States, while some Arab countries such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia may play a role in moving the negotiations forward,
Hassan added.

Sudanese analyst Ammar Awad told Al-Monitor that the Arab League statement reflects a unified Arab position to support Sudan and Egypt in case the GERD issue is reinternationalized at the Security Council.
The statement also has a moral aspect that shows that Arab and Arab-African peoples care about the danger threatening Sudan and Egypt,
he said.

Awad noted,
The negotiation path did not lead to a solution, and the recent efforts by the AU, United States https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... am-dispute and European Union mediators failed to bring all parties back to the negotiation table, although the date of the second filling is approaching.
Speaking to Al-Monitor, William Davison, a researcher at the International Crisis Group, ruled out the possibility of the Security Council discussing the GERD issue.
Even if that happens, it is not clear what action the members of the council can agree on since it is a recent security issue.
He said,
I expect diplomatic tensions [between the three countries] to increase over the second filling that Ethiopia is preparing to move forward with despite the absence of an agreement, which will be faced by opposition on Sudan’s and Egypt’s part.
The biggest concern, according to Davison, is the issue turning into an ongoing tension such as the border dispute https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/20 ... talks.html between Sudan and Ethiopia, which might lead to increased efforts by all parties to destabilize each other through proxy conflicts, in the absence of other options to influence Ethiopia.

Aba
Member
Posts: 4018
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 17:52

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Aba » 20 Jun 2021, 18:07

Sudan calls for international sanctions against Ethiopia

Sudanese Foreign Minister accuses Ethiopia of filling dam without reaching agreement with downstream countries



 Daily News Egypt  6 hours ago  

Sudan’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Maryam Al-Sadiq Al-Mahdi has demanded that the international community impose sanctions on Ethiopia for its intransigence regarding its controversial dam.

This relates particularly to the negotiations over the filling and operation of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), which is being built over the Blue Nile.  

Al-Mahdi accused Ethiopia of insisting on completing the second filling of GERD without reaching an agreement with the two downstream countries, Egypt and Sudan...
https://dailynewsegypt.com/2021/06/20/s ... -ethiopia/

Jaegol
Member
Posts: 1619
Joined: 31 Oct 2019, 20:06

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Jaegol » 20 Jun 2021, 19:55

I am happy for my Somalia brothers for reading my mind... my business plan of the future is ship fish a plane a week to Addis and grow to the point of export a plane a day....
Just that plane the Somalia brothers shipping from Mogadishu to Addis is 5000 tons at $1500 that’s about 7.5 million dollars let’s say pay taxes, labor, transportation... other expenses totaling 2.5 million....5.0 million in profits

Eritrea can do this 5 million dollars in 20 working days 100 million dollars a month business... on my Goodness... Eritrea is blessed beyond imagination
Monday Addis
Tuesday Dubai
Wednesday Jedda
Thursday Rome
Friday Amsterdam
The sky is the limit



Zmeselo wrote:
20 Jun 2021, 16:10




ዛሬ ምሽት ሁሉንም የፖለቲካ ፓርቲዎች በማሰባሰብ የመልካም ምኞት መግለጫ ሥነ ሥርዓት ያዘጋጀውን "ማይንድ ኢትዮጵያ" እናመሰግናለን፡፡ በእርግጥም ኢትዮጵያ ታሸንፋለች!




Thank you to MIND Ethiopia, for the initiative to bring all political parties together this evening in a well- wishing ceremony. Indeed, Ethiopia will prevail!




መልክም እድል ለሁሉም:: Good Luck to all!
Abiy Ahmed Ali: @AbiyAhmedAli


____________________________



Aba
Member
Posts: 4018
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 17:52

Re: Ethiopia: WHO director-general works as TPLF diplomat

Post by Aba » 20 Jun 2021, 21:43

Violators to Come Under Scrutiny at UN Human Rights Council 

By Lisa Schlein. June 20, 2021 12:50 PM


FILE - United Nations' High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet adjusts her glasses during the opening of 45th session of the Human Rights Council, at the European UN headquarters in Geneva, Sept. 14, 2020.


GENEVA - Countries accused of abusing their peoples’ human rights will come under the lens of the U.N. Human Rights Council over the next three weeks.   Dozens of thematic issues and country reports on topics including the COVID-19 pandemic will be addressed during the session, which begins Monday.

The U.N. high commissioner for human rights, Michelle Bachelet, will present an oral update on the human rights crisis unfolding in Myanmar since the military coup there on February 1. Her report is likely to reflect condemnation of the military leaders’ violent crackdown on the civilian population and, what she sees as a looming threat of civil war in the country. 

The council also will hear updates on the human rights situation in other countries, including Eritrea, Iran, Nicaragua, South Sudan, and Syria. Separately, observers view events in northern Ethiopia’s Tigray region as one of the most serious human rights issues around. 

The executive director of Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth, says reports of imminent famine, summary executions, rape and other atrocities perpetrated in Tigray warrant action by the Human Rights Council.  He is calling for the adoption of a resolution condemning these practices at this session. 

“A resolution should clearly name the governments," he said. "We know that Ethiopian government forces have been major perpetrators of these crimes along with, as you mentioned, the Eritrean forces. It is important to recognize the Eritrean forces did not invade Tigray. They were invited in by the Ethiopian government.”   

Violence erupted in Tigray in November when forces of the Tigrayan People’s Liberation front attacked federal military bases in the region. The Ethiopian government responded with the use of military force. 

High Commissioner Bachelet also will present a report on police violence and systemic racism against people of African descent. The death of African American George Floyd while in police custody in the United States last year triggered a special council session one year ago.   

Roth says he believes the report should have a strong focus on the United States.  He adds, however, that systemic racism is a global problem and should be treated as such. 

“Our concern is really that the council creates some kind of mechanism to continue this. It is not just a one-off report, but there is a more systematic effort to address root causes and to push for accountability…I do not say that at all to try to minimize the situation in the U.S. The U.S. should be a critical focus of those efforts,” he said.  

The council’s last session in February focused on efforts to combat COVID-19-related violations.  Bachelet will present a report on how states are responding to the pandemic. COVID-19 also will feature as a sub-theme into reports and panel discussions this session. 
https://www.voanews.com/europe/violator ... ts-council

Post Reply